Sustainable production of methanol using landfill gas via carbon dioxide reforming and hydrogenation: Process development and techno-economic analysis

被引:25
|
作者
Gao, Ruxing [1 ]
Zhang, Chundong [2 ]
Lee, Yun-Jo [3 ]
Kwak, Geunjae [3 ,4 ]
Jun, Ki-Won [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Seok Ki [3 ,4 ]
Park, Hae-Gu [3 ]
Guan, Guofeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Chem Engn, State Key Lab Mat Oriented Chem Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[3] Korea Res Inst Chem Technol KRICT, Carbon Resources Inst, Gas Separat & Convers Res Grp C1, Daejeon 34114, South Korea
[4] Korea Univ Sci & Technol UST, Adv Mat & Chem Engn, Daejeon 34113, South Korea
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Greenhouse gas; CO2; utilization; Landfill gas; Methanol synthesis; Economic analysis; NATURAL-GAS; EFFICIENT UTILIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; CONVERSION; STEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122552
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aiming at achieving the large-scale CO2-equivalent reduction in the landfill industry, conceptual design of two sustainable landfill gas-to-methanol process options without the pre-treatment and methanol upgrading sections were implemented via using Aspen Plus simulator. In both proposed options, the optimum syngas ratio (H-2/(2CO + 3CO(2)) = 1) is fulfilled by either supplying additional H-2 (option 1) or pre-separating the surplus CO2 in LFG using membrane (option 2). A comparative techno-economic analysis was carried out to determine the energy efficiency and the CO2-equivalent reduction rate, as well as the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and the discounted payback period (DPBP) of both proposed options. It is shown that both options 1 and 2 can be regarded as alternative processes for converting landfill gas to methanol, and option 1 is more energy efficient and eco-friendly, while, option 2 is more economically competitive. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the CAPEX, the prices of methanol, CO2 allowance, and H-2 are the most sensitive factors, and option 1 can be economically comparable with option 2 given that the H-2 price can be lowered down to around 1000 $/Mt. This work provides two candidate process routes for efficient conversion of landfill gas to value-added methanol, which makes the landfill industry become more sustainable and profitable, especially in the event of a future high carbon tax and low H-2 price. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Full carbon upcycling of landfill gas into methanol by integrating CO2 hydrogenation and methane reforming: Process development and techno-economic analysis
    Lee, Junyoung
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Kim, Jiyong
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 199
  • [2] Comparative Techno-economic analysis of methanol production via carbon dioxide reforming of landfill gas using a highly active and stable Nickel-based catalyst
    Lee, Yeol-Lim
    Lim, Dongjun
    Lee, Boreum
    Upadhyay, Mukesh
    Brigljevic, Boris
    Roh, Hyun-Seog
    Lim, Hankwon
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 259
  • [3] Methanol production via direct carbon dioxide hydrogenation using hydrogen from photocatalytic water splitting: Process development and techno-economic analysis
    Alsayegh, Sari
    Johnson, J. R.
    Ohs, Burkhard
    Wessling, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 208 : 1446 - 1458
  • [4] Techno-economic and environmental assessments for sustainable bio-methanol production as landfill gas valorization
    Choe, Changgwon
    Byun, Manhee
    Lee, Hyunhee
    Lim, Hankwon
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 150 : 90 - 97
  • [5] Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production from dehydrogenation and steam reforming of ethanol for carbon dioxide conversion to methanol
    Khamhaeng, P.
    Laosiripojana, N.
    Assabumrungrat, S.
    Kim-Lohsoontorn, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (60) : 30891 - 30902
  • [6] Techno-economic evaluation of simultaneous methanol and hydrogen production via autothermal reforming of natural gas
    Zahid, Umer
    Khalafalla, Siddig S.
    Alibrahim, Hussain A.
    Ahmed, Usama
    Jameel, Abdul Gani Abdul
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 296
  • [7] Carbon dioxide utilization in a gas-to-methanol process combined with CO2/Steam-mixed reforming: Techno-economic analysis
    Zhang, Chundong
    Jun, Ki-Won
    Gao, Ruxing
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Park, Hae-Gu
    [J]. FUEL, 2017, 190 : 303 - 311
  • [8] Power and biogas to methanol - A techno-economic analysis of carbon-maximized green methanol production via two reforming approaches
    Bube, Stefan
    Sens, Lucas
    Drawer, Chris
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 304
  • [9] Techno-economic analysis of coke oven gas and blast furnace gas to methanol process with carbon dioxide capture and utilization
    Deng, Lingyan
    Adams, Thomas A., II
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 204
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production via dimethylether steam reforming and methanol steam reforming
    Rahatade, Shardul S.
    Mali, Nilesh A.
    [J]. INDIAN CHEMICAL ENGINEER, 2023, 65 (04) : 352 - 368