Comparison of friction coefficient and surface roughness on stainless steel nickel titanium, and nickel-titanium copper wires to standard edgewise brackets: An experimental in vitro study

被引:0
|
作者
Dwinuria, Yuniar Elsa [1 ]
Nugroho, Dimas Iman [1 ]
Sjamsudin, Jusuf [1 ]
Narmada, Ida Bagus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Airlangga, Fac Dent Med, Dept Orthodont, Jalan Mayjen Prof Dr Moestopo 47, Surabaya, Indonesia
来源
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Dental Medicine; Friction Coefficient; Nickel Titanium; Nickel-Titanium Copper; Stainless Steel; ORTHODONTIC ARCHWIRES;
D O I
10.4103/jioh.jioh_54_20
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the friction and the difference in the roughness of the wire on the standard edgewise bracket. Materials and Methods: This was an experimental laboratory study with a posttest only control group design. The number of samples in this research was 21. The samples were divided into three groups (n = 7) consisting of 0.016 ' ' x 0.022 ' ' stainless steel archwire (SS group), 0.016 ' ' x 0.022 ' ' nickel-titanium archwire (NiTi group), and 0.016 ' ' x 0.022 ' ' nickel-titanium copper archwire (NiTiCu group). The bracket used in each group is standard edgewise slot 0.018. Friction coefficient test was conducted by creating an examination tool from acrylic to fixate the bracket with a size of 2cm x 5cm. The bracket was then attached using glue (polyvinyl acetate) and the archwire was fixated to the bracket using power O. After the friction test, three samples were taken from each group to be tested morphology and topography of each type using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis used in this research is using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to find out the comparison of variables and Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) to find out the comparison between three groups (P < 0.05). Results: The lowest friction coefficient was found in SS archwire, which consecutively followed by NiTiCu and NiTi. The smoothest archwire surface observed by SEM was SS, followed by NiTiCu and NiTi. Conclusion: SS wire has the smoothest archwire surface and the lowest frictional force, so it is well used for the teeth movement in space closing on edgewise bracket.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 75
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments
    Carvalho, LAP
    Bonetti, I
    Borges, MAG
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (12) : 807 - 810
  • [32] Comparative short-term in vitro analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion on esthetic, nickel-titanium, and stainless-steel arch wires
    Kim, In-Hye
    Park, Hyo-Sang
    Kim, Young Kyung
    Kim, Kyo-Han
    Kwon, Tae-Yub
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (04) : 680 - 686
  • [33] Comparison of Mechanical Stability of Elastic Titanium, Nickel-Titanium, and Stainless Steel Nails Used in the Fixation of Diaphyseal Long Bone Fractures
    Lee, Pei-Yuan
    Chen, Yen-Nien
    Hu, Jin-Jia
    Chang, Chih-Han
    MATERIALS, 2018, 11 (11):
  • [34] Evaluation of canal transportation and centring ability of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel rotary systems: an in-vitro study
    Saleh, Mohamed Adel
    Zaazou, Ashraf Mamdouh
    Leheta, Nehal Adel
    ENDO-ENDODONTIC PRACTICE TODAY, 2018, 12 (04): : 267 - 274
  • [35] Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation:: A clinical study
    Schäfer, E
    Schulz-Bongert, U
    Tulus, G
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2004, 30 (06) : 432 - 435
  • [36] Comparison of root canal preparation using reciprocating Safesiders stainless steel and Vortex nickel-titanium instruments
    Rhodes, S. Craig
    Huelsmann, Michael
    McNeal, Sandre F.
    Beck, Preston
    Eleazer, Paul D.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2011, 111 (05): : 659 - 667
  • [37] Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel spreader penetration and accessory cone fit in curved canals
    Schmidt, KJ
    Walker, TL
    Johnson, JD
    Nicoll, BK
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2000, 26 (01) : 42 - 44
  • [38] Comparison of generated forces and apical microleakage using nickel-titanium and stainless steel finger spreaders in curved canals
    Gharai, SR
    Thorpe, JR
    Strother, JM
    McClanahan, SB
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2005, 31 (03) : 198 - 200
  • [39] A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design:: Torsional and bending tests
    Kazemi, RB
    Stenman, E
    Spångberg, LSW
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 90 (04): : 500 - 506
  • [40] Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments
    Vaudt, J.
    Bitter, K.
    Neumann, K.
    Kielbassa, A. M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2009, 42 (01) : 22 - 33