Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis on Urban Solid Waste Categorized Collection of China

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Sijing [1 ]
Ma, Yundong [2 ]
Jiang, Ying [3 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Tech Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Engn, Fuxin, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Jiaotong Univ, Sch Environm & Chem Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] Liaoning Tech Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Fuxin, Peoples R China
关键词
urban solid waste; categorized collection; mixed collection; cost-benefit analysis; Shanghai; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/ICEET.2009.532
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The common disposal methods for acceptable urban solid waste (USW) in China are open dump and sanitary landfill, which will definitely bring problems like environmental pollution, resource waste and land occupation etc.. Categorized collection is one of the best way to solve the problems and also the primary prerequisite of resource utilization of the waste. The objective of this study is to carry out a survey of urban solid waste generation and composition from 2004 to 2006 in Shanghai, the most developed city of China. By applying the economic mathematic method, the USW categorized collection model is established, the cost and benefit of the mixed collection and classified collection are analyzed and evaluated. The result shows that it is feasible to collect the USW by classification, which may simplify the waste disposal procedure, improve the resource recovery rate, save social cost and achieve favorable economic returns. In a word, it is a scientific and effective method to realize the quantitative reduction and resource recovery of USW.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Representations of environmental concerns in cost-benefit analyses of solid waste recycling
    Pickin, Joe
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 53 (1-2) : 79 - 85
  • [22] Optimizing Indonesian municipal solid waste collection scenarios: integration of multi-objective search simulation and social cost-benefit analysis
    Miftahadi, Machmuddin Fitra
    Rachman, Indriyani
    Matsumoto, Toru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 26 (03) : 1569 - 1587
  • [23] Cost-benefit equals the cost of life - The economic benefit of death
    Gotloib, L
    [J]. NEPHRON, 1997, 76 (03): : 354 - 354
  • [24] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [25] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [26] Cost-benefit analysis of China's farming system
    Suo, Xinhao
    Cao, Shixiong
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (03) : 2407 - 2416
  • [27] Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Concentrated Solar Power in China
    Yang, Shuxia
    Zhu, Xianguo
    Guo, Weishang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [28] Life Cycle Analysis and Cost-Benefit Assessment of the Waste Collection System in Anyama, Cote d'Ivoire
    Kouassi, Hyacinthe Kouakou
    Murayama, Toru
    Ota, Mitsuru
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [29] Commentary on Cost-Benefit Analysis Article for Nuclear Waste Management
    North, D. Warner
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 37 (07) : 1233 - 1234
  • [30] Cost-benefit analysis of integrated approach of waste and energy management
    Dobraja, Kristine
    Barisa, Aiga
    Rosa, Marika
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2015, 2016, 95 : 104 - 111