Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Concentrated Solar Power in China

被引:20
|
作者
Yang, Shuxia [1 ]
Zhu, Xianguo [1 ]
Guo, Weishang [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2018/4063691
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In 2016, the first batch of concentrated solar power (CSP) demonstration projects of China was formally approved. Due to the important impact of the cost-benefit on the investment decisions and policy-making, this paper adopted the static payback period (SP), net present value (NPV), net present value rate (NPVR), and internal rate of return (IRR) to analyze and discuss the cost-benefit of CSP demonstration plants. The results showed the following. (1) The SP of CSP systems is relatively longer, due to high initial investment; but the cost-benefit of CSP demonstration plants as a whole is better, because of good expected incomes. (2) Vast majority of CSP projects could gain excess returns, on the basis of meeting the profitability required by the benchmark yield of 10%. (3) The cost-benefit of solar tower CSP technology (IRR of 12.33%) is better than that of parabolic trough CSP technology (IRR of 11.72%) and linear Fresnel CSP technology (IRR of 11.43%). (4) The annual electricity production and initial costs have significant impacts on the cost-benefit of CSP systems; the effects of operation and maintenance costs and loan interest rate on the cost-benefit of CSP systems are relatively smaller but cannot be ignored.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit evolution for concentrated solar power in China
    Ren Ling-zhi
    Zhao Xin-gang
    Yu Xin-xuan
    Zhang Yu-zhuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 190 : 471 - 482
  • [2] A cost-benefit analysis for the economic growth in China
    Wen, Zongguo
    Chen, Jining
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (02) : 356 - 366
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services in China
    Cao, Shixiong
    Yu, Zhongqi
    Zhang, Junze
    Feng, Fei
    Xu, Duanyang
    Mu, Xingmin
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 125 : 143 - 148
  • [4] Economical Validation of Residential Solar Power Investment: A Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach
    Liu, Xin
    Yin, Yangtian
    Choi, Kunhee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 38 (03)
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis of a photovoltaic power plant
    Sanchez Reinoso, C. R.
    De Paula, M.
    Buitrago, R. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (16) : 8708 - 8711
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of BOT power plants
    Xing, WG
    Wu, FF
    [J]. 2000 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY WINTER MEETING - VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 850 - 854
  • [7] Application and cost-benefit analysis of solar hybrid power installation on merchant marine vessels
    Glykas, Alexandros
    Papaioannou, George
    Perissakis, Stylianos
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2010, 37 (07) : 592 - 602
  • [8] Transitioning from coal to solar: A cost-benefit analysis for sustainable power generation in Indonesia
    Sugiyono, Agus
    Rahardjo, Irawan
    Wijaya, Prima Trie
    Dwijatmiko, Afri
    Aminuddin
    Siregar, Erwin
    Fithri, Silvy Rahmah
    Niode, Nona
    Fitriana, Ira Fitriana
    [J]. AIMS ENERGY, 2024, 12 (01) : 152 - 166
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    [J]. NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [10] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    [J]. KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3