Effects of midazolam before or after alfaxalone for co-induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs

被引:17
|
作者
Zapata, Ana [1 ]
Laredo, Francisco G. [1 ]
Escobar, Mayte [1 ]
Agut, Amalia [1 ]
Soler, Marta [1 ]
Belda, Eliseo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Fac Vet, Dept Anim Med & Surg, Murcia, Spain
关键词
alfaxalone; behavioural changes; co-induction; dog; excitement; midazolam; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; CARDIOPULMONARY PARAMETERS; DOSE REQUIREMENTS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PROPOFOL; INDUCTION; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; PREMEDICATION; ACEPROMAZINE; ETOMIDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaa.2018.04.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To study the effect of alternating the order of midazolam and alfaxalone administration on the incidence of behavioural changes, alfaxalone induction dose and some cardiorespiratory variables in healthy dogs. Study design Prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Animals A total of 33 client-owned dogs undergoing elective procedures. Methods Following intramuscular acepromazine (0.02 mg kg(-1)) and morphine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) premedication, anaesthesia was induced intravenously (IV) with a co-induction of either midazolam (0.25 mg kg(-1)) prior to alfaxalone (0.5 mg kg(-1); group MA), or alfaxalone followed by midazolam at identical doses (group AM). The control group (CA) was administered normal saline IV prior to alfaxalone administration. Additional alfaxalone (0.25 mg kg(-1) increments) was administered as required in all groups until orotracheal intubation was possible. Changes in behaviour, quality of induction, ease of intubation and incidence of adverse events at induction were recorded. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f(R)) and systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) were measured before treatments (baseline values), 30 minutes after premedication and at 0, 2, 5 and 10 minutes postintubation. Results The incidence of excitement was higher in group MA compared with groups CA (p = 0.005) and AM (p = 0.013). The mean induction dose of alfaxalone was lower in group AM compared with group CA (p = 0.003). Quality of induction and ease of intubation were similar among groups. Mean HR values decreased after premedication and increased after alfaxalone administration in all groups. Mean SAP values were similar between groups. The number of animals that required manual ventilation was higher in the MA group. Conclusions and clinical relevance Despite a lower occurrence of adverse events at induction in group AM compared with group MA and a reduction of alfaxalone dose requirement in group AM compared with group CA, the use of an alfaxalonee midazolam co-induction does not seem to produce any cardiovascular or respiratory benefits in healthy dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 617
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of chemical and mechanical stimulation on laryngeal motion during alfaxalone, thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in healthy dogs
    Labuscagne, Sandra
    Zeiler, Gareth E.
    Dzikiti, Brighton T.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 46 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [32] Cardiopulmonary and anesthetic effects of the combination of butorphanol, midazolam and alfaxalone in Beagle dogs
    Seo, Jeong-Im
    Han, Suk-Hee
    Choi, Ran
    Han, Janet
    Lee, Lyon
    Hyun, Changbaig
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 42 (03) : 304 - 308
  • [33] Clinical efficacy and cardiorespiratory effects of alfaxalone, or diazepam/fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia in dogs that are a poor anaesthetic risk
    Psatha, Evdokia
    Alibhai, Hatim Ik
    Jimenez-Lozano, Angeles
    Armitage-Chan, Elizabeth
    Brodbelt, David C.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 38 (01) : 24 - 36
  • [34] SMALL DOSE PROPOFOL OR KETAMINE AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO MIDAZOLAM CO-INDUCTION TO PROPOFOL
    Srivastava, Uma
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Kumar, Aditya
    Saxena, Surekha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 50 (02) : 112 - 114
  • [35] Comparison of intraocular pressure, tear production and cardiorespiratory variables before and after induction of anaesthesia with either propofol or ketofol in dogs premedicated with midazolam
    Rastabi, H. Imani
    Baniadam, A.
    Ronagh, A.
    Khajeh, A.
    Kamyabnia, M.
    VETERINARNI MEDICINA, 2018, 63 (06) : 271 - 278
  • [36] Evaluation of the quality of the recovery after administration of propofol or alfaxalone for induction of anaesthesia in dogs anaesthetized for magnetic resonance imaging
    Jimenez, Carolina P.
    Mathis, Alessandra
    Mora, Sandra S.
    Brodbelt, David
    Alibhai, Hatim
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 39 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [37] CO-INDUCTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MIDAZOLAM KETAMINE AND PROPOFOL AS COINDUCING AGENTS TO PROPOFOL
    Mallikarjuna, Jyothi
    Purneema, K.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (61): : 10666 - 10680
  • [38] Comparison of pain on injection during induction of anaesthesia with alfaxalone and two formulations of propofol in dogs
    Michou, Joanne N.
    Leece, Elizabeth A.
    Brearley, Jacqueline C.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 39 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [39] Comparison of the effects of propofol or alfaxalone for anaesthesia induction and maintenance on respiration in cats
    Campagna, Ivo
    Schwarz, Andrea
    Keller, Stefanie
    Bettschart-Wolfensberger, Regula
    Mosing, Martina
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 42 (05) : 484 - 492
  • [40] Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children
    Goel, Shiba
    Bhardwaj, Neerja
    Jain, Kajal
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (07) : 628 - 634