Effects of midazolam before or after alfaxalone for co-induction of anaesthesia in healthy dogs

被引:17
|
作者
Zapata, Ana [1 ]
Laredo, Francisco G. [1 ]
Escobar, Mayte [1 ]
Agut, Amalia [1 ]
Soler, Marta [1 ]
Belda, Eliseo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Fac Vet, Dept Anim Med & Surg, Murcia, Spain
关键词
alfaxalone; behavioural changes; co-induction; dog; excitement; midazolam; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; CARDIOPULMONARY PARAMETERS; DOSE REQUIREMENTS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PROPOFOL; INDUCTION; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; PREMEDICATION; ACEPROMAZINE; ETOMIDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaa.2018.04.002
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective To study the effect of alternating the order of midazolam and alfaxalone administration on the incidence of behavioural changes, alfaxalone induction dose and some cardiorespiratory variables in healthy dogs. Study design Prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Animals A total of 33 client-owned dogs undergoing elective procedures. Methods Following intramuscular acepromazine (0.02 mg kg(-1)) and morphine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) premedication, anaesthesia was induced intravenously (IV) with a co-induction of either midazolam (0.25 mg kg(-1)) prior to alfaxalone (0.5 mg kg(-1); group MA), or alfaxalone followed by midazolam at identical doses (group AM). The control group (CA) was administered normal saline IV prior to alfaxalone administration. Additional alfaxalone (0.25 mg kg(-1) increments) was administered as required in all groups until orotracheal intubation was possible. Changes in behaviour, quality of induction, ease of intubation and incidence of adverse events at induction were recorded. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f(R)) and systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) were measured before treatments (baseline values), 30 minutes after premedication and at 0, 2, 5 and 10 minutes postintubation. Results The incidence of excitement was higher in group MA compared with groups CA (p = 0.005) and AM (p = 0.013). The mean induction dose of alfaxalone was lower in group AM compared with group CA (p = 0.003). Quality of induction and ease of intubation were similar among groups. Mean HR values decreased after premedication and increased after alfaxalone administration in all groups. Mean SAP values were similar between groups. The number of animals that required manual ventilation was higher in the MA group. Conclusions and clinical relevance Despite a lower occurrence of adverse events at induction in group AM compared with group MA and a reduction of alfaxalone dose requirement in group AM compared with group CA, the use of an alfaxalonee midazolam co-induction does not seem to produce any cardiovascular or respiratory benefits in healthy dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 617
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of midazolam co-induction on cardiorespiratory variables, myoclonus and etomidate dose requirements in healthy cats
    Gieger, Samantha M.
    Keating, Stephanie C. J.
    Strahl-Heldreth, Danielle E.
    Martins, Felipe
    Pavlovsky, Gene
    Oba, Patricia M.
    Swanson, Kelly S.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2025, 52 (02) : 192 - 199
  • [22] Effects of premedication with fentanyl and midazolam on mask induction of anaesthesia of dogs with sevoflurane
    Mutoh, T.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2007, 160 (05) : 152 - +
  • [23] Evaluation of the use of midazolam as a co-induction agent with ketamine for anaesthesia in sedated ponies undergoing field castration
    Allison, A.
    Robinson, R.
    Jolliffe, C.
    Taylor, P. M.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 50 (03) : 321 - 326
  • [24] Induction of anaesthesia with alfaxalone or propofol before isoflurane maintenance in cats
    Taboada, F. Martinez
    Murison, P. J.
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2010, 167 (03) : 85 - 89
  • [25] Effects of ketamine or midazolam continuous rate infusions on alfaxalone total intravenous anaesthesia requirements and recovery quality in healthy dogs: a randomized clinical trial
    Bustamante, Rocio
    de Segura, Ignacio A. Gomez
    Canfran, Susana
    Aguado, Delia
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 47 (04) : 437 - 446
  • [26] Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery
    Djaiani, G
    Ribes-Pastor, MP
    ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (01) : 63 - 67
  • [27] Comparison of the sedative effects of alfaxalone and methadone with or without midazolam in dogs
    Micieli, Fabiana
    Chiavaccini, Ludovica
    Pare, Monique D.
    Chagas, Joana Braun
    Vesce, Giancarlo
    Gianotti, Giacomo
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2019, 60 (10): : 1060 - 1064
  • [28] The effects of propofol-midazolam-ketamine co-induction on hemodynamic changes and catecholamine response
    Abbasivash, Rahman
    Aghdashi, Mir Moosa
    Sinaei, Behzad
    Kheradmand, Fatemeh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2014, 26 (08) : 628 - 633
  • [29] Evaluation of midazolam as intravenous induction agent for anaesthesia in dogs
    Abu Rafee, Malik
    Kinjavdekar, Prakash
    Amarpal
    Aithal, H. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 87 (03): : 280 - 286
  • [30] A comparison of the effects of two different doses of ketamine used for co-induction of anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs
    Mair, Alastair R.
    Pawson, Patricia
    Courcier, Emily
    Flaherty, Derek
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 36 (06) : 532 - 538