3D treatment planning and intensity-modulated radiation therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Purdy, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Ctr Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK | 1999年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional (3D) image-based treatment planning and new delivery technologies have spurred the implementation of external beam radiation therapy techniques, in which the high-dose region is conformed much more closely to the target volume than previously possible, thus reducing the volume of normal tissues receiving a high dose. This form of external beam irradiation is referred to as 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). 3DCRT is not just art add-on to the current radiation oncology process; it represents a radical change in practice, particularly for the radiation oncologist. Defining tal get volumes and organs at risk in 3D by drawing contours on CT images on a slice-by-slice basis, as opposed to drawing beam portals on a simulator radiograph, can be challenging, because radiation oncologists are generally not well trained in cross-sectional imaging. Currently, the 3DCRT approach will increase the time and effort required by physicians inexperienced with 3D treatment planning. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a more advanced form of 3DCRT, but there is considerable developmental work remaining. The instrumentation arn methods used for IMRT quality assurance procedures and testing are not well established. Computer optimization cost functions are too simplistic, and thus time-consuming. Subjective plan evaluation by the radiation oncologist is still the norm. In addition, many fundamental questions regarding IMRT remain unanswered. For example, the radiobiophysical consequences of altered time-dose-fraction are unknown. Also, the fact that there is much greater dose heterogeneity for both the target and normal critical structures with IMRT compared to traditional in radiation techniques challenges current radiation oncology planning principles. However, this new process of planning and treatment delivery shows significant potential for improving the therapeutic ratio. In addition, while inefficient today, these systems, when fully developed, will improve the efficiency with which external beam radiation therapy cart be planned and delivered, thus lowering costs.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 168
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inverse Planning for 3D Intensity-Modulated Grid-Therapy
    Chen, J.
    Rashid, D.
    Yu, E.
    Fakir, H.
    Karnas, S.
    Jordan, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3980 - 3980
  • [2] Obstacles and advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Alaly, James R.
    Zakaryan, Konstantin
    [J]. IMRT, IGRT, SBRT: ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2007, 40 : 42 - 58
  • [3] Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal proton therapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of metastatic brain cancer
    Sullivan, Matthew
    Jin, Hosang
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (02) : 73 - 76
  • [4] Planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Yu, Cedric X.
    Amies, Christopher J.
    Svatos, Michelle
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5233 - 5241
  • [5] Integer Programming Applied to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Eva K. Lee
    Tim Fox
    Ian Crocker
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2003, 119 : 165 - 181
  • [6] Integer programming applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Lee, EK
    Fox, T
    Crocker, I
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 119 (1-4) : 165 - 181
  • [7] Issues in optimization for planning of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Verhey, LJ
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 210 - 218
  • [8] An Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System
    Ahmed, Shabbir
    Gozbasi, Ozan
    Savelsbergh, Martin
    Crocker, Ian
    Fox, Tim
    Schreibmann, Eduard
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2010, 22 (04) : 568 - 583
  • [9] Pitfalls in normalization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Williams, G
    Tobler, M
    Leavitt, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (04) : 194 - 200
  • [10] Handling Multiple Clinical Objectives in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Lee, E.
    Cha, K.
    Deasy, J.
    Hamilton, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3214 - +