Obstacles and advances in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning

被引:12
|
作者
Deasy, Joseph O. [1 ]
Alaly, James R. [1 ]
Zakaryan, Konstantin [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Siteman Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1159/000106027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this paper, the current state of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems is reviewed, including some inefficiencies along with useful workarounds and potential advances. Common obstacles in IMRT treatment planning are discussed, including problems due to the lack of scatter tails in optimization dose calculations, unexpected hot spots appearing in uncontoured regions, and uncontrolled tradeoffs inherent in conventional systems. Workarounds that can be applied in current systems are reviewed, including the incorporation of an 'anchor zone' around the target volume (including a margin of separation), which typically induces adequate dose falloff around the target, and the use of pseudostructures to reduce conflicts among objective functions. We propose changing the planning problem statement so that different dosimetric or outcome goals are prioritized as part of the prescription ('prioritized prescription optimization'). Higher-priority goals are turned into constraints for iterations that consider lower-priority goals. This would control tradeoffs between dosimetric objectives. A plan review tool is proposed that specifically summarizes distances from a structure to hot or cold doses ('dose-distance plots'). An algorithm for including scatter in the optimization process is also discussed. Lastly, brief comments are made about the ongoing effort to use outcome models to rank or optimize treatment plans. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 58
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Yu, Cedric X.
    Amies, Christopher J.
    Svatos, Michelle
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5233 - 5241
  • [2] Integer Programming Applied to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Eva K. Lee
    Tim Fox
    Ian Crocker
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2003, 119 : 165 - 181
  • [3] 3D treatment planning and intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Purdy, JA
    [J]. ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 1999, 13 (10): : 155 - 168
  • [4] Integer programming applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning
    Lee, EK
    Fox, T
    Crocker, I
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 119 (1-4) : 165 - 181
  • [5] Issues in optimization for planning of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Verhey, LJ
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) : 210 - 218
  • [6] An Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System
    Ahmed, Shabbir
    Gozbasi, Ozan
    Savelsbergh, Martin
    Crocker, Ian
    Fox, Tim
    Schreibmann, Eduard
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2010, 22 (04) : 568 - 583
  • [7] Pitfalls in normalization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Williams, G
    Tobler, M
    Leavitt, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2005, 30 (04) : 194 - 200
  • [8] Handling Multiple Clinical Objectives in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning
    Lee, E.
    Cha, K.
    Deasy, J.
    Hamilton, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3214 - +
  • [9] Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer
    Hunt, MA
    Zelefsky, MJ
    Wolden, S
    Chui, CS
    LoSasso, T
    Rosenzweig, K
    Chong, L
    Spirou, SV
    Fromme, L
    Lumley, M
    Amols, HA
    Ling, CL
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03): : 623 - 632
  • [10] Mixed modality intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for intracranial lesions
    Lee, HJ
    Forster, KM
    Sheldon, JM
    Wood, RR
    Spirou, SV
    Burman, CM
    Chui, CS
    Fuks, ZY
    Ling, CC
    Kutcher, GJ
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 149 - 149