Deep convolutional neural network applied to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014 category classification: a pilot study

被引:29
|
作者
Yamashita, Rikiya [1 ]
Mittendorf, Amber [2 ]
Zhu, Zhe [2 ]
Fowler, Kathryn J. [3 ]
Santillan, Cynthia S. [3 ]
Sirlin, Claude B. [3 ]
Bashir, Mustafa R. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Do, Richard K. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Body Imaging Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Ctr Adv Magnet Resonance Dev, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Grp, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Magnet Resonance Dev, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
日本学术振兴会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Deep learning; X-ray computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ALGORITHM; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-019-02306-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model to categorize multiphase CT and MRI liver observations using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) (version 2014).MethodsA pre-existing dataset comprising 314 hepatic observations (163 CT, 151 MRI) with corresponding diameters and LI-RADS categories (LR-1-5) assigned in consensus by two LI-RADS steering committee members was used to develop two CNNs: pre-trained network with an input of triple-phase images (training with transfer learning) and custom-made network with an input of quadruple-phase images (training from scratch). The dataset was randomly split into training, validation, and internal test sets (70:15:15 split). The overall accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were assessed for categorizing LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5. External validation was performed for the model with the better performance on the internal test set using two external datasets (EXT-CT and EXT-MR: 68 and 44 observations, respectively).ResultsThe transfer learning model outperformed the custom-made model: overall accuracy of 60.4% and AUROCs of 0.85, 0.90, 0.63, 0.82 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively. On EXT-CT, the model had an overall accuracy of 41.2% and AUROCs of 0.70, 0.66, 0.60, 0.76 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively. On EXT-MR, the model had an overall accuracy of 47.7% and AUROCs of 0.88, 0.74, 0.69, 0.79 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively.ConclusionOur study shows the feasibility of CNN for assigning LI-RADS categories from a relatively small dataset but highlights the challenges of model development and validation.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 35
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for Hepatic Nodules in Cirrhotic Patients: A 2 year Retrospective Analysis
    Albrecht, Hana
    Gilroy, Richard
    Ash, Ryan
    O'Neil, Maura
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 413A - 414A
  • [32] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for Hepatic Nodules in Cirrhotic Patients: A 2 year Retrospective Analysis
    Albrecht, Hana
    Gilroy, Richard
    Ash, Ryan
    O'Neil, Maura
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 : 413A - 414A
  • [33] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Tiyarattanachai, Thodsawit
    Bird, Kristen N.
    Lo, Edward C.
    Mariano, Aladin T.
    Ho, Amanzo A.
    Ferguson, Craig W.
    Chima, Ranjit S.
    Desser, Terry S.
    Morimoto, Linda Nayeli
    Kamaya, Aya
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (11) : 5134 - 5141
  • [34] Imaging Outcomes of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014 Category 2, 3, and 4 Observations Detected at CT and MR Imaging
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Kanki, Akihiko
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Costa, Eduardo A. C.
    Mamidipalli, Adrija
    Ferreira, Marilia P. F. D.
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Middleton, Michael S.
    Gamst, Anthony C.
    Kono, Yuko
    Kuo, Alexander
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (01) : 129 - 139
  • [35] Common pitfalls when using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): lessons learned from a multi-year experience
    Cannella, Roberto
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Minervini, Marta I.
    Heller, Matthew
    Furlan, Alessandro
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [36] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: Reliability and agreement for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional treatment response
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    Badran, Ethar M.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (11) : 524 - 534
  • [37] Common pitfalls when using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): lessons learned from a multi-year experience
    Roberto Cannella
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Amir A. Borhani
    Marta I. Minervini
    Matthew Heller
    Alessandro Furlan
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 43 - 53
  • [38] Expanding the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 diagnostic population: performance and reliability of LI-RADS for distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver carcinoma in patients who do not meet strict LI-RADS high-risk criteria
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Cannella, Roberto
    Tsai, Richard
    Naeem, Muhammad
    LeBlanc, Maverick
    Salter, Amber
    Tsung, Allan
    Fleckenstein, Jaquelyn
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1697 - 1706
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 - a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Noh, Seung Yeon
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    Vezeridis, Alexander
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [40] Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2014 Algorithm and Imaging Features for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large International Multireader Study
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Tang, An
    Santillan, Cynthia
    Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi
    Heiken, Jay
    Jha, Reena C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey
    Hussain, Hero
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Costa, Eduardo A. C.
    Cunha, Guilherme M.
    Coombs, Laura
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Gamst, Anthony C.
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    Yeh, Benjamin
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (01) : 173 - 185