Deep convolutional neural network applied to the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014 category classification: a pilot study

被引:29
|
作者
Yamashita, Rikiya [1 ]
Mittendorf, Amber [2 ]
Zhu, Zhe [2 ]
Fowler, Kathryn J. [3 ]
Santillan, Cynthia S. [3 ]
Sirlin, Claude B. [3 ]
Bashir, Mustafa R. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Do, Richard K. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Body Imaging Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Ctr Adv Magnet Resonance Dev, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Grp, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Magnet Resonance Dev, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
日本学术振兴会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Deep learning; X-ray computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ALGORITHM; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-019-02306-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model to categorize multiphase CT and MRI liver observations using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) (version 2014).MethodsA pre-existing dataset comprising 314 hepatic observations (163 CT, 151 MRI) with corresponding diameters and LI-RADS categories (LR-1-5) assigned in consensus by two LI-RADS steering committee members was used to develop two CNNs: pre-trained network with an input of triple-phase images (training with transfer learning) and custom-made network with an input of quadruple-phase images (training from scratch). The dataset was randomly split into training, validation, and internal test sets (70:15:15 split). The overall accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were assessed for categorizing LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5. External validation was performed for the model with the better performance on the internal test set using two external datasets (EXT-CT and EXT-MR: 68 and 44 observations, respectively).ResultsThe transfer learning model outperformed the custom-made model: overall accuracy of 60.4% and AUROCs of 0.85, 0.90, 0.63, 0.82 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively. On EXT-CT, the model had an overall accuracy of 41.2% and AUROCs of 0.70, 0.66, 0.60, 0.76 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively. On EXT-MR, the model had an overall accuracy of 47.7% and AUROCs of 0.88, 0.74, 0.69, 0.79 for LR-1/2, LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, respectively.ConclusionOur study shows the feasibility of CNN for assigning LI-RADS categories from a relatively small dataset but highlights the challenges of model development and validation.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 35
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: Review of the CT/MRI Diagnostic Categories
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Dellacerra, Gary
    Holder, Justin
    Erlichman, David
    Chernyak, Victoria
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (01): : 142 - 149
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    An, Chansik
    Kim, Sungwon
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 2038 - 2046
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI
    Yeun-Yoon Kim
    Chansik An
    Sungwon Kim
    Myeong-Jin Kim
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 2038 - 2046
  • [24] Use of percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy for Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS) observations: A retrospective study from two liver transplant centers
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Dasyam, Navya
    Buros, Christopher
    Thompson, Cole P.
    Minervini, Marta, I
    Kierans, Andrea Siobhan
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (02) : 235 - 238
  • [25] Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : E316 - E324
  • [26] Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in FDG PET-MRI for Cirrhotic and Metastatic Cancer Patients
    Franceschi, Ana
    DeSantis, Mark
    Safaie, Elham
    Matthews, Robert
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58
  • [27] AUTOMATING LIVER REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (LI-RADS) TO CLASSIFY HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Curtis, H. R.
    Jin, J.
    Christie, M.
    Wilding, A.
    Villamor, S.
    Park, J.
    Beaven, A.
    Smith, T.
    Jin, D.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (01) : NP459 - NP459
  • [28] Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study
    Daniel R. Ludwig
    Erin K. Romberg
    Tyler J. Fraum
    Eric Rohe
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Geetika Khanna
    Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 49 : 746 - 758
  • [29] Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Romberg, Erin K.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Rohe, Eric
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Khanna, Geetika
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 49 (06) : 746 - 758
  • [30] Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US LI-RADS) Visualization Score: a reliability analysis on inter-reader agreement
    Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
    Kristen N. Bird
    Edward C. Lo
    Aladin T. Mariano
    Amanzo A. Ho
    Craig W. Ferguson
    Ranjit S. Chima
    Terry S. Desser
    Linda Nayeli Morimoto
    Aya Kamaya
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5134 - 5141