Assessment of machine learning and ensemble methods for fault diagnosis of photovoltaic systems

被引:60
|
作者
Mellit, Adel [1 ,2 ]
Kalogirou, Soteris [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jijel, Renewable Energy Lab, Jijel, Algeria
[2] AS Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Trieste, Italy
[3] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci & Engn, Limassol, Cyprus
[4] Cyprus Acad Sci Letters & Arts, Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
Photovoltaic system; Fault detection; Fault classi fication; Machine learning; Ensemble learning; CLASSIFICATION; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The photovoltaic (PV) array is the most sensible element in PV plants, which is subject to different type of faults and defects. Thus, to keep these plants working efficiently they should be monitored and protected carefully. Some faults if they are not detected and isolated promptly they may lead to hazardous risks. The diagnosis of PV systems is widely addressed and recently machine learning (ML) and deep leaning (DL) methods drawn the attention of many researchers. Most applications of ML methods are based on the use of the I-V curves measurement, as enough information and features can be extracted from the curves, to detect and classify faults. These methods showed their capability to classify some faults, like line to line, degradation, disconnected PV modules, partial shading effect, and bypass diode faults. Another approach is based on the use of thermal or electroluminescence images of PV modules/arrays to detect and identify defects, such as hot spot, snails crack, and others. In this paper, different ML and ensemble learning (EL) methods are evaluated for fault diagnosis of PV arrays. The focus is mainly on the detection and classification of some complex faults that may affect the PV arrays, i.e., multiple faults, and faults with similar I-V curves, that are not evaluated before. The results showed the ability of the methods developed to detect faults with very good accuracy (classification rate = number of classified instances/total instances), within 99%, while the classification faults is done with an acceptable accuracy, within 81.73%. Through this study it is shown when really ML and EL methods should be used, and some recommendations, challenges and future directions in this topic are presented.(c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1090
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ensemble Learning Techniques-Based Monitoring Charts for Fault Detection in Photovoltaic Systems
    Harrou, Fouzi
    Taghezouit, Bilal
    Khadraoui, Sofiane
    Dairi, Abdelkader
    Sun, Ying
    Arab, Amar Hadj
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (18)
  • [32] The intelligent fault diagnosis for composite systems based on machine learning
    Wu, Li-Hua
    Jiang, Yun-Fei
    Huang, Wei
    Chen, Ai-Xiang
    Zhang, Xue-Nong
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2006, : 571 - +
  • [33] Research on the machine learning method in fault diagnosis expert systems
    Wang, DP
    Feng, ZS
    Dong, YY
    ISTM/99: 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, 1999, : 371 - 375
  • [34] Hybrid and Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning
    Kazienko, Przemyslaw
    Lughofer, Edwin
    Trawinski, Bogdan
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2013, 19 (04) : 457 - 461
  • [35] Fault Classification for Single Phase Photovoltaic Systems using Machine Learning Techniques
    Ahmad, Sameen
    Hasan, Nabeel
    Kurukuru, V. S. Bharath
    Khan, Mohammed Ali
    Haque, Ahteshamul
    2018 8TH IEEE INDIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER ELECTRONICS (IICPE), 2018,
  • [36] Crack fault diagnosis of rotating machine in nuclear power plant based on ensemble learning
    Zhong, Xianping
    Ban, Heng
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2022, 168
  • [37] Supervised process monitoring and fault diagnosis based on machine learning methods
    Hajer Lahdhiri
    Maroua Said
    Khaoula Ben Abdellafou
    Okba Taouali
    Mohamed Faouzi Harkat
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 102 : 2321 - 2337
  • [38] Machine Learning Methods for Fault Diagnosis in AC Microgrids: A Systematic Review
    Zaben, Muiz M.
    Worku, Muhammed Y.
    Hassan, Mohamed A.
    Abido, Mohammad A.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 20260 - 20298
  • [39] Review and Perspectives of Machine Learning Methods for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis
    Tang, Mingzhu
    Zhao, Qi
    Wu, Huawei
    Wang, Ziming
    Meng, Caihua
    Wang, Yifan
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [40] Supervised process monitoring and fault diagnosis based on machine learning methods
    Lahdhiri, Hajer
    Said, Maroua
    Ben Abdellafou, Khaoula
    Taouali, Okba
    Harkat, Mohamed Faouzi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 102 (5-8): : 2321 - 2337