Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs

被引:58
|
作者
Gandhi, Anup A. [1 ,2 ]
Kode, Swathi [1 ,2 ]
DeVries, Nicole A. [1 ,2 ]
Grosland, Nicole M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Smucker, Joseph D. [3 ]
Fredericks, Douglas C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Ctr Comp Aided Design, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
total disc replacement; arthroplasty; fusion; spine biomechanics; adjacent segment degeneration; BRYAN; PRESTIGE LP; arthrodesis; disc replacement plus fusion; range of motion; hybrid loading; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE; ARTHROPLASTY; ADJACENT; RADICULOPATHY; ARTHRODESIS; DISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study comparing arthroplasty with fusion using human cadaveric C2-T1 spines. Objective. To compare the kinematics of the cervical spine after arthroplasty and fusion using single level, 2 level and hybrid constructs. Summary of Background Data. Previous studies have shown that spinal levels adjacent to a fusion experience increased motion and higher stress which may lead to adjacent segment disc degeneration. Cervical arthroplasty achieves similar decompression but preserves the motion at the operated level, potentially decreasing the occurrence of adjacent segment disc degeneration. Methods. 11 specimens (C2-T1) were divided into 2 groups (BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP). The specimens were tested in the following order; intact, single level total disc replacement (TDR) at C5-C6, 2-level TDR at C5-C6-C7, fusion at C5-C6 and TDR at C6-C7 (Hybrid construct), and lastly a 2-level fusion. The intact specimens were tested up to a moment of 2.0 Nm. After each surgical intervention, the specimens were loaded until the primary motion (C2-T1) matched the motion of the respective intact state (hybrid control). Results. An arthroplasty preserved motion at the implanted level and maintained normal motion at the nonoperative levels. Arthrodesis resulted in a significant decrease in motion at the fused level and an increase in motion at the unfused levels. In the hybrid construct, the TDR adjacent to fusion preserved motion at the arthroplasty level, thereby reducing the demand on the other levels. Conclusion. Cervical disc arthroplasty with both the BRYAN and PRESTIGE LP discs not only preserved the motion at the operated level, but also maintained the normal motion at the adjacent levels. Under simulated physiologic loading, the motion patterns of the spine with the BRYAN or PRESTIGE LP disc were very similar and were closer than fusion to the intact motion pattern. An adjacent segment disc replacement is biomechanically favorable to a fusion in the presence of a pre-existing fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1585
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disc Replacement Adjacent to Cervical Fusion A Biomechanical Comparison of Hybrid Construct Versus Two-Level Fusion
    Lee, Michael J.
    Dumonski, Mark
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Voronov, Leonard I.
    Renner, Susan M.
    Carandang, Gerard
    Havey, Robert M.
    Patwardhan, Avinash G.
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (23) : 1932 - 1939
  • [2] Kinetic and biomechanical testing of two-level cervical disc replacement
    McGilvray, Kirk C.
    Lyons, Amy S.
    Turner, A. Simon
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Puttlitz, Christian M.
    PROCEEDING OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2007, 2007, : 677 - 678
  • [3] Biomechanical and kinetic testing of two-level cervical disc replacement
    Santoni, B. G.
    Lyons, A. S.
    McGilvray, K. C.
    Turner, A. S.
    Patel, V. V.
    Puttlitz, C. M.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2010, 61 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [4] Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Erkan, Serkan
    Rivera, Yamil
    Wu, Chunhui
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (10): : 830 - 835
  • [5] Biomechanics of Hybrid Anterior Cervical Fusion and Artificial Disc Replacement in 3-Level Constructs: An In Vitro Investigation
    Liao, Zhenhua
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Pu, Ting
    Gu, Hongsheng
    Liu, Weiqiang
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 3348 - 3355
  • [6] Artificial Disc Replacement Combined With Fusion Versus Two-Level Fusion in Cervical Two-Level Disc Disease
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Yi, Seong
    Yoon, Do Heum
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Shin, Hyun Cheol
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (11) : 1153 - 1159
  • [7] Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs
    Kang, Daniel G.
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Tracey, Robert W.
    Cody, John P.
    Gaume, Rachel E.
    Lehman, Ronald A., Jr.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (07) : 681 - 688
  • [8] Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Pandey, Praveen Kumar
    Pawar, Inder
    Gupta, Jyoti
    Verma, Raaghav Rai
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (01) : E41 - E49
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    McAnany, Steven
    Goz, Vadim
    Koehler, Steven M.
    Hecht, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2013, 19 (05) : 546 - 554
  • [10] Artificial Disc Replacement Combined With Fusion Versus Two-Level Fusion in Cervical Two-Level Disc Disease Point of View
    McAfee, Paul
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (11) : 1160 - 1161