Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair

被引:100
|
作者
Friedman, Richard J. [1 ]
Flurin, Pierre-Henri [2 ]
Wright, Thomas W. [3 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [4 ]
Roche, Christopher P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Orthopaed, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Clin Sport Bordeaux Merignac, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Exactech, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Shoulder; arthroplasty; reverse; subscapularis; dislocation; complications; CUFF TEAR ARTHRITIS; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY; FRACTURE SEQUELAE; PROSTHESIS; DISLOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Repair of the subscapularis with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is controversial. The purpose of this study is to quantify rTSA outcomes in patients with and without subscapularis repair to determine if there is any impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Three hundred forty patients received rTSA and had the subscapularis repaired, whereas 251 patients received rTSA and did not have the subscapularis repaired. The patients were scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using the Simple Shoulder Test; University of California, Los Angeles; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Constant; and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index metrics. Motion was also measured. Mean follow-up was 37 months. Results: All patients showed significant improvements in pain and function after treatment with rTSA. For both cohorts, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores significantly improved, as did range of motion. The repaired cohort had significantly higher postoperative scores as measured by 4 of the 5 metrics and significantly more internal rotation, whereas the non-repaired cohort had significantly more active abduction and passive external rotation. The complication rate was 7.4% (0% dislocations) for the subscapularis-repaired cohort and 6.8% (1.2% dislocations) for the non-subscapularis-repaired cohort. Conclusions: Significant clinical improvements were observed for both the subscapularis-repaired and non-repaired cohorts, with some statistical differences observed using a variety of outcome measures. Repair of the subscapularis did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes as predicted by biomechanical models. No difference was noted in the complication or scapular notching rates between cohorts. These clinical results show that rTSA using a lateralized humeral prosthesis delivers reliable clinical improvements with a low risk of instability, regardless of subscapularis repair. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for patients with inflammatory arthritis
    Garcia, Jose Rafael
    Cannon, Dylan
    Rodriguez, Hugo C.
    Grewal, Gagan
    Lewis, Steven
    Lapica, Hans
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (03) : 573 - 580
  • [32] Is subscapularis repair associated with better outcome compared to non-repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative trials
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Gerogiannis, Dimitrios
    Chronopoulos, Efstathios
    Kaseta, Maria-Kyriaki
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Antonogiannakis, Emmanouil
    ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2019, 11 (03) : 134 - 141
  • [33] Total shoulder arthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Outcome comparison in osteoarthritis patients with or without concurrent rotator cuff deficiency
    Liu, Haifeng
    Huang, Tony Chieh-Ting
    Yu, Hanzhong
    Wang, Yicun
    Wang, Daping
    Long, Zeling
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (32) : E29896
  • [34] Does the subscapularis repair affect the clinical outcome after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Ameziane, Yacine
    Holschen, Malte
    Engel, Nina Myline
    Schorn, Dominik
    Witt, Kai-Axel
    Steinbeck, Jorn
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (09) : 1909 - 1917
  • [35] Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis
    Clark, Jason C.
    Ritchie, Joseph
    Song, Frederick S.
    Kissenberth, Michael J.
    Tolan, Stefan J.
    Hart, Nathan D.
    Hawkins, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [36] The effect of smoking on outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Damrow, Derek S.
    Buchanan, Timothy R.
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Amador, Isabella E.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    Simcox, Trevor
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Lamonica, Tyler J.
    King, Joseph J.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (04) : 987 - 996
  • [37] Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Edwards, T. Bradley
    Williams, Matthew D.
    Labriola, Joanne E.
    Elkousy, Hussein A.
    Gartsman, Gary M.
    O'Connor, Daniel P.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (06) : 892 - 896
  • [38] Comparison of Bone Removed with Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Roche, Christopher P.
    Diep, Phong
    Hamilton, Matthew A.
    Flurin, Pierre-Henri
    Routman, Howard D.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2013, 71 : S36 - S40
  • [39] Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    Everding, Nathan G.
    Gil, Carlos C., Jr.
    Stephens, Scott
    Giveans, M. Russell
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (12) : 1872 - 1881
  • [40] Partial Subscapularis Release for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty A Biomechanical Comparison of Two Techniques
    Kummer, Frederick J.
    Mahoney, Andrew P.
    Onyekwelu, Ikemefuna
    Kwon, Young W.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2014, 72 (04): : 259 - 262