Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair

被引:100
|
作者
Friedman, Richard J. [1 ]
Flurin, Pierre-Henri [2 ]
Wright, Thomas W. [3 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [4 ]
Roche, Christopher P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Orthopaed, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Clin Sport Bordeaux Merignac, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Exactech, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Shoulder; arthroplasty; reverse; subscapularis; dislocation; complications; CUFF TEAR ARTHRITIS; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY; FRACTURE SEQUELAE; PROSTHESIS; DISLOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Repair of the subscapularis with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is controversial. The purpose of this study is to quantify rTSA outcomes in patients with and without subscapularis repair to determine if there is any impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Three hundred forty patients received rTSA and had the subscapularis repaired, whereas 251 patients received rTSA and did not have the subscapularis repaired. The patients were scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using the Simple Shoulder Test; University of California, Los Angeles; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; Constant; and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index metrics. Motion was also measured. Mean follow-up was 37 months. Results: All patients showed significant improvements in pain and function after treatment with rTSA. For both cohorts, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores significantly improved, as did range of motion. The repaired cohort had significantly higher postoperative scores as measured by 4 of the 5 metrics and significantly more internal rotation, whereas the non-repaired cohort had significantly more active abduction and passive external rotation. The complication rate was 7.4% (0% dislocations) for the subscapularis-repaired cohort and 6.8% (1.2% dislocations) for the non-subscapularis-repaired cohort. Conclusions: Significant clinical improvements were observed for both the subscapularis-repaired and non-repaired cohorts, with some statistical differences observed using a variety of outcome measures. Repair of the subscapularis did not lead to inferior clinical outcomes as predicted by biomechanical models. No difference was noted in the complication or scapular notching rates between cohorts. These clinical results show that rTSA using a lateralized humeral prosthesis delivers reliable clinical improvements with a low risk of instability, regardless of subscapularis repair. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subscapularis Repair After Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Cagle, Paul J., Jr.
    Shukla, Dave R.
    Parsons, Bradford O.
    Flatow, Evan L.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 16 (01): : 38 - 42
  • [22] Subscapularis Management in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Sacevich, Nathan
    Athwal, George S.
    Lapner, Peter
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 40 (05): : 1009 - 1011
  • [23] Subscapularis repair for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bethell, Mikhail A.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Welch, Jessica
    Cabell, Grant
    Levin, Jay
    Lassiter, Tally E.
    Boachie-Adjei, Yaw D.
    Anakwenze, Oke
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (12) : 2631 - 2640
  • [24] Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Kiet, Tuyen K.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Naimark, Micah
    Gajiu, Tatiana
    Hall, Sarah L.
    Chung, Teddy T.
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [25] The biomechanics of subscapularis repair in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: The effect of lateralization and insertion site
    Eno, Jonathan-James T.
    Kontaxis, Andreas
    Novoa-Boldo, Alejandro
    Windsor, Eric
    Chen, Xiang
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Warren, Russell F.
    Dines, David M.
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Gulotta, Lawrence, V
    Taylor, Samuel A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (04) : 888 - 894
  • [26] Retrospective analysis of the subscapularis-sparing approach for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Pastor, Marc-Frederic
    Kruckenberg, Lea
    Ellwein, Alexander
    Karkosch, Roman
    Horstmann, Hauke
    Smith, Tomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (05): : 2683 - 2689
  • [27] Short-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with biceps augmentation of subscapularis peel repair
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Boufadel, Peter
    Koa, Jonathan
    Singh, Jaspal
    Lopez, Ryan
    Mehta, Nabil
    Achors, Kyle
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2025, 28 (01): : 15 - 22
  • [28] A biomechanical comparison of subscapularis tenotomy repair techniques for stemless shoulder arthroplasty
    Werner, Brian C.
    McClish, Sarah J.
    Mealey, Nicholas C.
    Wijdicks, Coen
    Thompson, Timothy
    Higgins, Laurence D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (04) : 711 - 717
  • [29] Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty
    Armstrong, April
    Lashgari, Cyrus
    Teefey, Sharlene
    Menendez, Jamie
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Galatz, Leesa M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (05) : 541 - 548
  • [30] Subscapularis Repair Augmentation With Bioinductive Implant During Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Barnes, Ryan H.
    Agan, Kate
    Pedroza, Angela D.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    Bishop, Julie Y.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (12): : e2289 - e2293