Need for Permanent Pacemaker After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Reduces Long-Term Survival

被引:51
|
作者
Mehaffey, J. Hunter [1 ]
Haywood, Nathan S. [1 ]
Hawkins, Robert B. [1 ]
Kern, John A. [1 ]
Teman, Nicholas R. [1 ]
Kron, Irving L. [1 ]
Yarboro, Leora T. [1 ]
Ailawadi, Gorav [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2018年 / 106卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACQUIRED HEART-DISEASE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IMPLANTATION; TRANSCATHETER; STENOSIS; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation has been touted as an inconsequential complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement moves to lower risk patients, the long-term implications remain poorly understood; therefore, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of pacemaker for surgical aortic valve replacement patients. Methods. A total of 2,600 consecutive patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement over the past 15 years were reviewed using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) institutional database and Social Security death records. Patients were stratified by placement of a PPM within 30 days of surgery. The impact of PPM placement on long-term survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted survival by Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results. A total of 72 patients (2.7%) required PPM placement postoperatively. Patients requiring PPM had more postoperative complications, including atrial fibrillation (43.1% versus 27.0%, p = 0.003), prolonged ventilation (16.7% versus 5.7%, p < 0.0001), and renal failure (12.5% versus 4.6%, p = 0.002). These led to greater resource utilization including longer intensive care unit stay (89 versus 44 hours, p < 0.0001) and hospital length of stay (9 versus 6 days, p < 0.0001), and higher inflation-adjusted hospital cost ($81,000 versus $47,000, p < 0.0001). Median follow-up was 7.5 years, and patients requiring PPM had significantly worse long-term survival (p = 0.02), even after risk adjustment with STS predicted risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.48, p = 0.02). Conclusions. The need for PPM after aortic valve replacement independently reduces long-term survival. The rate of PPM placement after surgical aortic valve replacement remains very low but dramatically increases resource utilization. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement expands to low-risk patients, the impact of PPM placement on long-term survival warrants close monitoring. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
下载
收藏
页码:460 / 465
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve patients
    Xiong, Tian-Yuan
    Liao, Yan-Biao
    Li, Yi-Jian
    Zhao, Zhen-Gang
    Wei, Xin
    Tsauo, Jiay-yu
    Xu, Yuan-Ning
    Feng, Yuan
    Chen, Mao
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (06) : 878 - 884
  • [42] Long-term impact of permanent cardiac pacing after surgical aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Servito, Maria
    Khoury, William
    Payne, Darrin
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    El-Diasty, Mohammad
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2022, 20 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [43] Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement
    Romano, Matthew A.
    Koeckert, Michael
    Mumtaz, Mubashir A.
    Slachman, Frank N.
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    Barnhart, Glenn R.
    Grossi, Eugene A.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 106 (03): : 685 - 690
  • [44] Effect of permanent pacemaker on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Engborg, Jonathan
    Riechel-Sarup, Casper
    Gerke, Oke
    Mickley, Hans
    Sandgaard, Niels Christian
    Nissen, Henrik
    Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2017, 51 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [45] Predicting Long-Term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement
    Parikh, Puja B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 201 : 375 - 377
  • [46] Trends in Permanent Pacemaker Placement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Khan, Muhammad
    Zahid, Salman
    Balla, Sudarshan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B99 - B99
  • [47] Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Hoyt, Matthew J.
    Hathaway, Jessica
    Palmer, Roseanne
    Beach, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (05) : 1162 - 1166
  • [48] Editorial: Valve Virtuosi and Pacer Placers - Reducing the Need for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2022, 6 (03):
  • [49] IMPACT OF LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK OR PERMANENT PACEMAKER AFTER TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT ON LONG-TERM LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION
    Merdler, Ilan
    Case, Brian
    Ben-Dor, Itsik
    Satler, Lowell F.
    Rogers, Toby
    Waksman, Ron
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 868 - 868
  • [50] Membranous Septum Length Predicts New Conduction Abnormalities in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Novel Predictor for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Nakashima, Makoto
    Jilaihawi, Hasan
    He, Yuxin
    Williams, David
    Pushkar, Illya
    Williams, Mathew
    Hisamoto, Kazuhiro
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 295 : 385 - 392