Need for Permanent Pacemaker After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Reduces Long-Term Survival

被引:51
|
作者
Mehaffey, J. Hunter [1 ]
Haywood, Nathan S. [1 ]
Hawkins, Robert B. [1 ]
Kern, John A. [1 ]
Teman, Nicholas R. [1 ]
Kron, Irving L. [1 ]
Yarboro, Leora T. [1 ]
Ailawadi, Gorav [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2018年 / 106卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACQUIRED HEART-DISEASE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IMPLANTATION; TRANSCATHETER; STENOSIS; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation has been touted as an inconsequential complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement moves to lower risk patients, the long-term implications remain poorly understood; therefore, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of pacemaker for surgical aortic valve replacement patients. Methods. A total of 2,600 consecutive patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement over the past 15 years were reviewed using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) institutional database and Social Security death records. Patients were stratified by placement of a PPM within 30 days of surgery. The impact of PPM placement on long-term survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk-adjusted survival by Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results. A total of 72 patients (2.7%) required PPM placement postoperatively. Patients requiring PPM had more postoperative complications, including atrial fibrillation (43.1% versus 27.0%, p = 0.003), prolonged ventilation (16.7% versus 5.7%, p < 0.0001), and renal failure (12.5% versus 4.6%, p = 0.002). These led to greater resource utilization including longer intensive care unit stay (89 versus 44 hours, p < 0.0001) and hospital length of stay (9 versus 6 days, p < 0.0001), and higher inflation-adjusted hospital cost ($81,000 versus $47,000, p < 0.0001). Median follow-up was 7.5 years, and patients requiring PPM had significantly worse long-term survival (p = 0.02), even after risk adjustment with STS predicted risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.48, p = 0.02). Conclusions. The need for PPM after aortic valve replacement independently reduces long-term survival. The rate of PPM placement after surgical aortic valve replacement remains very low but dramatically increases resource utilization. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement expands to low-risk patients, the impact of PPM placement on long-term survival warrants close monitoring. (C) 2018 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 465
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to surgical aortic valve replacement
    Hwang, You Mi
    Kim, Jun
    Nam, Gi Byoung
    Choi, Kee Joon
    Park, Duk-Woo
    Kang, Do-Yoon
    Park, Seung-Jung
    Park, Seo Young
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (22) : E26123
  • [32] Long-term survival after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low or intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis: Comparison with general population
    Maeda, Shusaku
    Toda, Koichi
    Shimamura, Kazuo
    Yoshioka, Daisuke
    Maeda, Koichi
    Yamada, Yu
    Igeta, Masataka
    Sakata, Yasushi
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [33] Long-term Hospital Readmissions After Surgical Vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Bianco, Valentino
    Kilic, Arman
    Gleason, Thomas G.
    Lee, Joon S.
    Schindler, John
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Wang, Yisi
    Navid, Forozan
    Kliner, Dustin
    Cavalcante, Joao L.
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 108 (04): : 1146 - 1153
  • [34] Need for permanent pacemaker implantation after corevalve, sapien and surgical aortic valve replacement: incidence, time course and predictive factors
    Franzoni, I.
    Latib, A.
    Chieffo, A.
    Buchanan, G. L.
    Slavich, M.
    Maisano, F.
    Montorfano, M.
    Radinovic, A.
    Alfieri, O.
    Colombo, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 33 : 668 - 668
  • [35] Socioeconomic factors and long-term mortality risk after surgical aortic valve replacement
    Lachonius, Maria
    Giang, Kok Wai
    Lindgren, Martin
    Skoglund, Kristofer
    Petursson, Petur
    Silverborn, Martin
    Jeppsson, Anders
    Nielsen, Susanne J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND PREVENTION, 2023, 19
  • [36] FACTORS INFLUENCING LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER ISOLATED AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT
    ISOM, OW
    DEMBROW, JM
    GLASSMAN, E
    PASTERNA.BS
    SACKLER, JP
    SPENCER, FC
    CIRCULATION, 1974, 50 (02) : 154 - 162
  • [37] Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement for native active infective endocarditis
    Pompilio, G
    Bruneau, M
    Buche, M
    Amrani, M
    Louagie, Y
    Eucher, P
    Rubay, J
    Jamart, J
    Dion, R
    Schoevaerdts, JC
    CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 6 (02): : 126 - 132
  • [38] Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: Potential influence of the type of prosthesis
    Ensminger S.
    Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, 2017, 31 (1) : 36 - 38
  • [39] Impact of obesity on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis
    Wang, Biao
    Yang, Hongyang
    Wang, Tao
    Zhang, Xiquan
    Zhu, Wenjie
    Cao, Guangqing
    Wu, Shuming
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 17 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [40] Early and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement in septuagenarians and octogenarians with severe aortic stenosis
    Ding, Wen-hong
    Lam, Yat-yin
    Pepper, John R.
    Kaya, Mehmet G.
    Li, Wei
    Chung, Robin
    Henein, Michael Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 141 (01) : 24 - 31