DMLC IMRT to moving tissues - Towards 4D therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Papiez, L.
McMahon, R.
Rangaraj, D.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2760819
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose. The goal of traditional approaches to IMRT delivery to moving tisues (gating, target outline tracking, IMRT tumor tracking) is to irradiate patient body so that effects of tisuue motion are eliminated and IMRT therapies in the presence of tissue motion are delivered so that the IMRT dose distributions for moving bodies are equivalent to the dose distribution delivered to the static body geometry. In contrast the proposed solution for IMRT delivery to moving tissues and organs aims at delivering treatments that are dosimetrically superior relative to any IMRT therapy possible for stationary body geometry. Methods. Treatment plans (3D) are derived for each phase of the (static) body geometry. This is done with existing planning software in comercial TPS and for body geometries defined by data scorred in 4D CT. Using the freedom of multiple solutions of DMLC IMRT delivery of given intensity map to moving target the exploitation of leaf trajectories and dose rate intensities are investigated (for each phase plan) to find the optimized treatment deliveries that are more advantageous than 3D IMRT plans derived for each phase of the static body geometry. The best deliverable plan among all derived for each of the motion phase is chosen as the one to be realized. The resulting intensity delivered by these strategies, and resulting dose distributions, are calculated and compared to best plans derived for each phase plans. Results. The example of treatment derived for particular phase of body motion geometry has been investigated. The DMLC IMRT delivery of given dose to target that simultaneously minimizes the dose delivered to organ at risk due to interaction between motion of leaves and motion of the target is calculated that shows the dosimetric advantage over 3D IMRT therapy. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2438 / 2438
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 4D IMRT QA: OptimumWays to Setup Motion Phantom
    Zhang, M.
    Song, Y.
    Voros, L.
    Tang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E569 - E569
  • [32] 4D Imaging and 4D Radiation Therapy: A New Era of Therapy Design and Delivery
    Low, Daniel
    IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 99 - 117
  • [33] 4D V/Q PET/CT and Lung IMRT
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (07) : 23N - 23N
  • [34] Towards a more robust 4D optimization for PBS-based moving tumor treatments
    Zhang, Y.
    Huth, I.
    Weber, D. C.
    Lomax, A. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S110 - S110
  • [35] Dosimetric errors in gated DMLC IMRT delivery to a moving target with a 120-leaf collimator
    Lerma, FA
    Mihaylov, IB
    Du, W
    Benedict, SH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S204 - S204
  • [36] 4D Locally Adaptive Radiation Delivery Using Integrated In-Room MRI and DMLC Tracking
    Sawant, A.
    Kondaji, S.
    Keall, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [37] Performance Analysis of an Electromagnetic Transponder-based DMLC Tracking System for 4D Radiotherapy Delivery
    Sawant, A.
    Cho, B.
    Poulsen, P.
    Ruan, D.
    Newell, J.
    Petersen, J.
    Keall, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S575 - S576
  • [38] Active control of 4D prints: Towards 4D printed reliable actuators and sensors
    Garces, I. T.
    Ayranci, C.
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2020, 301
  • [39] 4D seismic-to-well tying, a key step towards 4D inversion
    Thore, Pierre
    Hubans, Christian
    GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 77 (06) : R227 - R238
  • [40] Reconstruction of 4D deformed CT for moving anatomy
    Docef, Alen
    Murphy, Martin J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2008, 3 (06) : 591 - 598