Quality indicators for hip fracture patients: a scoping review protocol

被引:6
|
作者
Pitzul, Kristen B. [1 ]
Munce, Sarah E. P. [2 ]
Perrier, Laure [1 ]
Beaupre, Lauren [3 ,4 ]
Morin, Suzanne N. [5 ]
McGlasson, Rhona [6 ]
Jaglal, Susan B. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Bone & Joint Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2014年 / 4卷 / 10期
关键词
JOB DIFFERENT LEVELS; EXCESS MORTALITY; CARE; APPROPRIATE; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; RIGOR;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006543
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and care of hip fracture patients places a heavy burden on healthcare systems due to prolonged recovery time. Measuring quality of care delivered to hip fracture patients is important to help target efforts to improve care for patients and efficiency of the health system. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the evidence surrounding quality of care indicators for patients who have sustained a hip fracture. Using a scoping review methodology, the research question that will be addressed is: "What patient, institutional, and system-level indicators are currently in use or proposed for measuring quality of care across the continuum for individuals following a hip fracture?". Methods and analysis: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The synthesis will be limited to quality of care indicators for individuals who suffered low trauma hip fracture. All English peer-reviewed studies published from the year 2000-most recent will be included. Literature search strategies will be developed using medical subject headings and text words related to hip fracture quality indicators and the search will be peer-reviewed. Numerous electronic databases will be searched. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potentially relevant articles to determine final inclusion. Abstracted data will include study characteristics and indicator definitions. Dissemination: To improve quality of care for patients and create a more efficient healthcare system, mechanisms for the measurement of quality of care are required. The implementation of quality of care indicators enables stakeholders to target areas for improvement in service delivery. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the review with dissemination of the project goals and findings to local, national, and international stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scoping review of potential quality indicators for hip fracture patient care
    Pitzul, Kristen B.
    Munce, Sarah E. P.
    Perrier, Laure
    Beaupre, Lauren
    Morin, Suzanne N.
    McGlasson, Rhona
    Jaglal, Susan B.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [2] Quality indicators for clinical care of patients with hypertension: scoping review protocol
    Djasri, Hanevi
    Laras, Sekar
    Utarini, Adi
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [3] Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review
    Voeten, S. C.
    Krijnen, P.
    Voeten, D. M.
    Hegeman, J. H.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Schipper, I. B.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 (09) : 1963 - 1985
  • [4] Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review
    S.C. Voeten
    P. Krijnen
    D.M. Voeten
    J.H. Hegeman
    M.W.J.M. Wouters
    I.B. Schipper
    Osteoporosis International, 2018, 29 : 1963 - 1985
  • [5] Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol
    McArthur, Alexa
    Munn, Zachary
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 601 - 608
  • [6] Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol
    Richards, Ti-Amo DeRuz
    Kirkham, Julia
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    Anderson, Jennifer
    Bahji, Anees
    Allami, Youssef
    Crockford, David
    Dyson, Michele P.
    Ghosh, Sumantra Monty
    Hodgins, David
    Messier, Geoffrey
    Vik, Shelly
    Seitz, Dallas P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [7] Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol
    Lathlean, Timothy J. H.
    Inacio, Maria C.
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Gray, Len
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Hibbert, Peter
    Comans, Tracy
    Crotty, Maria
    Wesselingh, Steve
    Sluggett, Janet K.
    Ward, Stephanie
    Wabe, Nasir
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (09) : 1857 - 1865
  • [8] Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators
    Jolley, Rachel J.
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Manalili, Kimberly
    Lu, Mingshan
    Quan, Hude
    Santana, Maria J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [9] Protocol for a scoping review of patient-clinician digital health interventions for the population with hip fracture
    Backman, Chantal
    Papp, Steve
    Harley, Anne
    Houle, Sandra
    Skidmore, Becky
    Poitras, Stephane
    Green, Maeghn
    Shah, Soha
    Berdusco, Randa
    Beaule, Paul
    French-Merkley, Veronique
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [10] Quality indicators for schizophrenia care: A scoping review
    Anderson, Jennifer C.
    Seitz, Dallas P.
    Crockford, David
    Addington, Donald
    Baek, Hanji
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Barry, Rebecca
    Bolton, James M.
    Taylor, Valerie H.
    Kurdyak, Paul
    Kirkham, Julia
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2024, 274 : 406 - 416