Quality indicators for hip fracture patients: a scoping review protocol

被引:6
|
作者
Pitzul, Kristen B. [1 ]
Munce, Sarah E. P. [2 ]
Perrier, Laure [1 ]
Beaupre, Lauren [3 ,4 ]
Morin, Suzanne N. [5 ]
McGlasson, Rhona [6 ]
Jaglal, Susan B. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Bone & Joint Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2014年 / 4卷 / 10期
关键词
JOB DIFFERENT LEVELS; EXCESS MORTALITY; CARE; APPROPRIATE; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; RIGOR;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006543
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and care of hip fracture patients places a heavy burden on healthcare systems due to prolonged recovery time. Measuring quality of care delivered to hip fracture patients is important to help target efforts to improve care for patients and efficiency of the health system. The purpose of this study is to synthesise the evidence surrounding quality of care indicators for patients who have sustained a hip fracture. Using a scoping review methodology, the research question that will be addressed is: "What patient, institutional, and system-level indicators are currently in use or proposed for measuring quality of care across the continuum for individuals following a hip fracture?". Methods and analysis: We will employ the methodological frameworks used by Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. The synthesis will be limited to quality of care indicators for individuals who suffered low trauma hip fracture. All English peer-reviewed studies published from the year 2000-most recent will be included. Literature search strategies will be developed using medical subject headings and text words related to hip fracture quality indicators and the search will be peer-reviewed. Numerous electronic databases will be searched. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts for inclusion, followed by screening of the full text of potentially relevant articles to determine final inclusion. Abstracted data will include study characteristics and indicator definitions. Dissemination: To improve quality of care for patients and create a more efficient healthcare system, mechanisms for the measurement of quality of care are required. The implementation of quality of care indicators enables stakeholders to target areas for improvement in service delivery. Knowledge translation activities will occur throughout the review with dissemination of the project goals and findings to local, national, and international stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality indicators and performance measures for prison healthcare: a scoping review
    Bellass, Sue
    Canvin, Krysia
    McLintock, Kate
    Wright, Nat
    Farragher, Tracey
    Foy, Robbie
    Sheard, Laura
    HEALTH & JUSTICE, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [42] Quality Indicators for Evaluating Prehospital Emergency Care: A Scoping Review
    Howard, Ian
    Cameron, Peter
    Wallis, Lee
    Castren, Maaret
    Lindstrom, Veronica
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [43] In search of quality indicators for Down syndrome healthcare: a scoping review
    Mareeuw, Francine A. van den Driessen
    Hollegien, Mirjam I.
    Coppus, Antonia M. W.
    Delnoij, Diana M. J.
    de Vries, Esther
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [44] Quality Indicators for Video Consultations in Primary Care - a Scoping Review
    Traulsen, Pia
    Steinhauser, Jost
    Waschkau, Alexander
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2023, 85 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [45] In search of quality indicators for Down syndrome healthcare: a scoping review
    Francine A. van den Driessen Mareeuw
    Mirjam I. Hollegien
    Antonia M. W. Coppus
    Diana M. J. Delnoij
    Esther de Vries
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [46] Quality indicators of telemedical care offshore-a scoping review
    Hellfritz, Michael
    Waschkau, Alexander
    Steinhauser, Jost
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] A Scoping Review of Process Indicators for Measuring Quality of Care in Glaucoma
    Iorio-Aranha, Flavio
    Peleteiro, Barbara
    Rocha-Sousa, Amandio
    Azevedo, Ana
    Barbosa-Breda, Joao
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (05) : E198 - E204
  • [48] KEY QUALITY INDICATORS FOR HIP FRACTURE CARE: WHAT TO MEASURE AND WHY
    Torres-Naranjo, J. F.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 : S66 - S66
  • [49] Quality indicators and performance measures for prison healthcare: a scoping review
    Sue Bellass
    Krysia Canvin
    Kate McLintock
    Nat Wright
    Tracey Farragher
    Robbie Foy
    Laura Sheard
    Health & Justice, 10
  • [50] The role of digital health for post-surgery care of older patients with hip fracture: A scoping review
    Zhang, Jing
    Yang, Minghui
    Ge, Yufeng
    Ivers, Rebecca
    Webster, Ruth
    Tian, Maoyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 160