Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
McArthur, Alexa [1 ,2 ]
Munn, Zachary [1 ,2 ]
Lizarondo, Lucylynn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, JBI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, JBI, Adelaide, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
audit criteria; health care quality; indicator development; quality improvement; quality indicators; OF-CARE; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.11124/JBIES-22-00056
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to locate, identify, and understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the development of quality indicators within evidence implementation health care programs.Introduction: Health care organizations evaluate care using quality improvement initiatives, which are based on quality indicators that are clearly defined and measure what they are intended to, based on structures, processes, or outcomes of care. However, the development of quality indicators is an area plagued by inconsistency and issues in terms of their pragmatic use in the health care context. Inconsistency when using terminology related to quality improvement has highlighted issues with distinct definitions, and many terms appear to be used interchangeably. This leads to confusion and a lack of clarity in what these terms are actually describing with regard to measures of quality in health care.Inclusion criteria:The proposed review will consider studies, guidelines, manuals, evidence syntheses, and other relevant literature that examine the key concepts, terms, or definitions used in the development of quality indicators and that identify the methods or frameworks used in the development approaches across the international health care setting.Methods: The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished documents, using a 3-step search strategy. Results of the search, study inclusion, data extraction, and analysis and presentation of results will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers, in accordance with JBI's methodology for conducting scoping reviews.Findings will be presented in tables or visual charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.Details of this review project are available at:Open Science Framework
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 608
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality indicators for hip fracture patients: a scoping review protocol
    Pitzul, Kristen B.
    Munce, Sarah E. P.
    Perrier, Laure
    Beaupre, Lauren
    Morin, Suzanne N.
    McGlasson, Rhona
    Jaglal, Susan B.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (10):
  • [2] Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review protocol
    McDonnell, Therese
    Cosgrove, Grainne
    Hogan, Emma
    Martin, Jennifer
    McNicholas, Triona
    O'Dowd, Marcella
    Rizoaica, Florina
    McAuliffe, Eilish
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [3] Quality indicators for clinical care of patients with hypertension: scoping review protocol
    Djasri, Hanevi
    Laras, Sekar
    Utarini, Adi
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [4] Developing an initial set of quality indicators for chiropractic care: a scoping review
    Vining, Robert
    Smith, Jennifer
    Anderson, Brian
    Almquist, Zachary
    Wong, Danveshka
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Developing an initial set of quality indicators for chiropractic care: a scoping review
    Robert Vining
    Jennifer Smith
    Brian Anderson
    Zachary Almquist
    Danveshka Wong
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [6] Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol
    Lathlean, Timothy J. H.
    Inacio, Maria C.
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Gray, Len
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Hibbert, Peter
    Comans, Tracy
    Crotty, Maria
    Wesselingh, Steve
    Sluggett, Janet K.
    Ward, Stephanie
    Wabe, Nasir
    Caughey, Gillian E.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (09) : 1857 - 1865
  • [7] Methodological components and quality of evidence summaries: a scoping review protocol
    Whitehorn, Ashley
    Porritt, Kylie
    Lockwood, Craig
    Xing, Weijie
    Zhu, Zheng
    Hu, Yan
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (10) : 2157 - 2163
  • [8] Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Jeyaraman, Maya
    Attia, Abdelhamid
    Al-Inany, Hesham G.
    Ferri, Mauricio
    Ansari, Mohammed T.
    Garritty, Chantelle M.
    Bond, Kenneth
    Norris, Susan L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [9] How are qualitative methods used in implementation science research? A scoping review protocol
    Hagaman, Ashley
    Rhodes, Elizabeth C.
    Nyhan, Kate
    Katague, Marina
    Schwartz, Anna
    Spiegelman, Donna
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (06) : 1344 - 1353
  • [10] Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators
    Jolley, Rachel J.
    Lorenzetti, Diane L.
    Manalili, Kimberly
    Lu, Mingshan
    Quan, Hude
    Santana, Maria J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):