Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: systematic review

被引:8
|
作者
Tsang, C. [1 ]
Lee, K. S. [2 ]
Richards, H. [1 ]
Blazeby, J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Avery, K. N. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Ctr Surg Res, 39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; READMISSION; WEB;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zraa072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Little is known about the electronic collection and clinical feedback of patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) following surgical discharge. This systematic review summarized the evidence on the collection and uses of electronic systems to collect PROs after discharge from hospital after surgery. Method: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Central were undertaken from database inception to July 2019 using terms for `patient reported outcomes', 'electronic', 'surgery' and 'at home'. Primary research of all study designs was included if they used electronic systems to collect PRO data in adults after hospital discharge following surgery. Data were collected on the settings, patient groups and specialties, ePRO systems (including features and functions), PRO data collected, and integration with health records. Results: Fourteen studies were included from 9474 records, including two RCTs and six orthopaedic surgery studies. Most studies (9 of 14) used commercial ePRO systems. Six reported types of electronic device were used: tablets or other portable devices (3 studies), smartphones (2), combination of smartphones, tablets, portable devices and computers (1). Systems had limited features and functions such as real-time clinical feedback (6 studies) and messaging service for patients with care teams (3). No study described ePRO system integration with electronic health records to support clinical feedback. Conclusion: There is limited reporting of ePRO systems in the surgical literature, and ePRO systems lack integration with hospital clinical systems. Future research should describe the ePRO system and ePRO questionnaires used, and challenges encountered during the study, to support efficient upscaling of ePRO systems using tried and tested approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electronic Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Discharge After Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Tsang, C.
    Lee, K. S.
    Richards, H.
    Blazeby, J.
    Avery, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 210 - 210
  • [2] Advances in remote electronic monitoring of patient-reported outcomes following discharge after surgery: a systematic review
    Anderton, Nathan
    Richards, Hollie
    Shah, Maximilian
    Blazeby, Jane
    Avery, Kerry
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [3] Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: A systematic review
    Waljee, Jennifer
    McGlinn, Evan P.
    Sears, Erika Davis
    Chung, Kevin C.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (05) : 799 - 808
  • [4] Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery
    Prasad, Shashi
    Fong, Eric
    Ooi, Eng H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [5] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES PROJECT IN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Al-Ghabari, M.
    Michl, K.
    Ahmed
    Bele, S.
    Santana, M.
    Gregory, A.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (SUPPL 1) : S45 - S46
  • [6] Assessing health outcomes: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology
    Urretavizcaya, Mikel
    Alvarez, Karen
    Olariaga, Olatz
    Tames, Maria Jose
    Asensio, Ainhoa
    Cajaraville, Gerardo
    Riestra, Ana Cristina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [7] The electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess symptom burden after ambulatory cancer surgery
    Stabile, Cara
    Pusic, Andrea
    Simon, Brett
    Stein, Daniel
    Stetson, Peter
    Salvaggio, Rori
    Vickers, Andrew
    Lilavois, Magalie
    Laudone, Vincent
    Twersky, Rebecca
    Levine, Marcia
    Carter, Jeanne
    Dueck, Amylou
    Basch, Ethan
    Temple, Larissa
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S25 - S26
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Transsexual Surgery
    Barone, M.
    Cogliandro, A.
    Di Stefano, N.
    Tambone, V.
    Persichetti, P.
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (03) : 700 - 713
  • [9] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Transsexual Surgery
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    N. Di Stefano
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 700 - 713
  • [10] CANCER SURVIVORSHIP REGISTRIES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC NARRATIVE REVIEW
    Corsini, Nadia
    Fish, Jennifer
    Halliday, Amber
    Flight, Ingrid
    Ramsey, Imogen
    Wiggins, Bonnie
    Wilson, Carlene
    Eckert, Marion
    Sharplin, Greg
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2015, 11 : 109 - 109