Noninvasive Autoregulation Monitoring with and without Intracranial Pressure in the Naive Piglet Brain

被引:43
|
作者
Brady, Ken M. [1 ]
Mytar, Jennifer O. [1 ]
Kibler, Kathleen K. [1 ]
Hogue, Charles W., Jr. [1 ]
Lee, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Czosnyka, Marek [2 ]
Smielewski, Peter [2 ]
Easley, R. Blaine [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Acad Neurosurg, Cambridge, England
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2010年 / 111卷 / 01期
关键词
CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; PERFUSION-PRESSURE; HEAD-INJURY; LOWER LIMIT; REACTIVITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e054ba
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring is often desirable for critically ill patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) is not measured directly. Without ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a substitute for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) to gauge the constraint of cerebral blood flow across pressure changes. We compared the use of ABP versus CPP to measure autoregulation in a piglet model of arterial hypotension. METHODS: Our database of neonatal piglet (5-7 days old) experiments was queried for animals with naive ICP that were made lethally hypotensive to determine the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA). Twenty-five piglets were identified, each with continuous recordings of ICP, regional cerebral oximetry (rSo(2)), and cortical red cell flux (laser Doppler). Autoregulation was assessed with the cerebral oximetry index (COx) in 2 ways: linear correlation between ABP and rSo(2) (COx(ABP)) and between CPP and rSo(2) (COx(CPP)). The lower limits of autoregulation were determined from plots of red cell flux versus ABP. Averaged values of COx(ABP) and COx(CPP) from 5 mm Hg ABP bins were used to show receiver operating characteristics for the 2 methods. RESULTS: COx(ABP) and COx(CPP) yielded identical receiver operating characteristic curve areas of 0.91(95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.88-0.95) for determining the LLA. However, the thresholds for the 2 methods differed: a threshold COx(ABP) of 0.5 was 89% sensitive (95% Cl, 81%-94%) and 81% specific (95% Cl, 73%-88%) for detecting ABP below the LLA. A threshold COx(CPP) of 0.42 gave the same 89% sensitivity (95% Cl, 81%-94%) with 77% specificity (95% Cl, 69%-84%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ABP instead of CPP for autoregulation monitoring in the naive brain with COx results in a higher threshold value to discriminate ABP above from ABP below the LLA. However, accuracy was similar with the 2 methods. These findings support and refine the use of near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor autoregulation in patients without ICP monitors. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:191-5)
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 195
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multimodal monitoring intracranial pressure by invasive and noninvasive means
    de Moraes, Fabiano Moulin
    Adissy, Erica Navarro Borba
    Rocha, Eva
    Barros, Felipe Chaves Duarte
    Freitas, Flavio Geraldo Rezende
    Miranda, Maramelia
    Valiente, Raul Alberto
    de Andrade, Joao Brainer Clares
    Chaddad-Neto, Feres Eduardo Aparecido
    Silva, Gisele Sampaio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [22] Multimodal monitoring intracranial pressure by invasive and noninvasive means
    Fabiano Moulin de Moraes
    Erica Navarro Borba Adissy
    Eva Rocha
    Felipe Chaves Duarte Barros
    Flávio Geraldo Rezende Freitas
    Maramelia Miranda
    Raul Alberto Valiente
    João Brainer Clares de Andrade
    Feres Eduardo Aparecido Chaddad-Neto
    Gisele Sampaio Silva
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [23] Pressure autoregulation, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation in children with severe traumatic brain injury
    Figaji, Anthony A.
    Zwane, Eugene
    Fieggen, A. Graham
    Argent, Andrew C.
    Le Roux, Peter D.
    Siesjo, Peter
    Peter, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-PEDIATRICS, 2009, 4 (05) : 420 - 428
  • [24] Intracranial pressure and brain monitoring XII
    Eric A. Schmidt
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2007, 149 (1) : 101 - 101
  • [25] Intracranial pressure monitoring for brain injury
    Chesnut, Randall M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 119 (05) : 1226 - 1226
  • [26] Pulsatile Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Autoregulation After Traumatic Brain Injury
    Radolovich, D. K.
    Aries, M. J. H.
    Castellani, G.
    Corona, A.
    Lavinio, A.
    Smielewski, P.
    Pickard, J. D.
    Czosnyka, M.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (03) : 379 - 386
  • [27] Pulsatile Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Autoregulation After Traumatic Brain Injury
    D. K. Radolovich
    M. J. H. Aries
    G. Castellani
    A. Corona
    A. Lavinio
    P. Smielewski
    J. D. Pickard
    M. Czosnyka
    Neurocritical Care, 2011, 15 : 379 - 386
  • [28] Testing dynamic cerebral autoregulation without blood pressure monitoring
    Shemagonov, A. V.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 283 (1-2) : 315 - 315
  • [29] The current status of noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring: A literature review
    Theodoropoulos, Dimitrios
    Karabetsos, Dimitrios A.
    Vakis, Antonios
    Papadaki, Efrosini
    Karantanas, Apostolos
    Marias, Kostas
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 239
  • [30] Accuracy of Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Seddighi, Amir Saied
    Seddighi, Afsoun
    Zali, Alireza
    BIOMEDICAL AND BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 8 (03): : 403 - 408