Noninvasive Autoregulation Monitoring with and without Intracranial Pressure in the Naive Piglet Brain

被引:43
|
作者
Brady, Ken M. [1 ]
Mytar, Jennifer O. [1 ]
Kibler, Kathleen K. [1 ]
Hogue, Charles W., Jr. [1 ]
Lee, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Czosnyka, Marek [2 ]
Smielewski, Peter [2 ]
Easley, R. Blaine [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Acad Neurosurg, Cambridge, England
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2010年 / 111卷 / 01期
关键词
CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; PERFUSION-PRESSURE; HEAD-INJURY; LOWER LIMIT; REACTIVITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e054ba
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring is often desirable for critically ill patients in whom intracranial pressure (ICP) is not measured directly. Without ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a substitute for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) to gauge the constraint of cerebral blood flow across pressure changes. We compared the use of ABP versus CPP to measure autoregulation in a piglet model of arterial hypotension. METHODS: Our database of neonatal piglet (5-7 days old) experiments was queried for animals with naive ICP that were made lethally hypotensive to determine the lower limit of autoregulation (LLA). Twenty-five piglets were identified, each with continuous recordings of ICP, regional cerebral oximetry (rSo(2)), and cortical red cell flux (laser Doppler). Autoregulation was assessed with the cerebral oximetry index (COx) in 2 ways: linear correlation between ABP and rSo(2) (COx(ABP)) and between CPP and rSo(2) (COx(CPP)). The lower limits of autoregulation were determined from plots of red cell flux versus ABP. Averaged values of COx(ABP) and COx(CPP) from 5 mm Hg ABP bins were used to show receiver operating characteristics for the 2 methods. RESULTS: COx(ABP) and COx(CPP) yielded identical receiver operating characteristic curve areas of 0.91(95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.88-0.95) for determining the LLA. However, the thresholds for the 2 methods differed: a threshold COx(ABP) of 0.5 was 89% sensitive (95% Cl, 81%-94%) and 81% specific (95% Cl, 73%-88%) for detecting ABP below the LLA. A threshold COx(CPP) of 0.42 gave the same 89% sensitivity (95% Cl, 81%-94%) with 77% specificity (95% Cl, 69%-84%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ABP instead of CPP for autoregulation monitoring in the naive brain with COx results in a higher threshold value to discriminate ABP above from ABP below the LLA. However, accuracy was similar with the 2 methods. These findings support and refine the use of near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor autoregulation in patients without ICP monitors. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:191-5)
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 195
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Catherine E. Hassett
    S. Pinar Uysal
    Robert Butler
    Nina Z. Moore
    Danilo Cardim
    Joao A. Gomes
    Neurocritical Care, 2023, 38 : 591 - 599
  • [2] Assessment of Cerebral Autoregulation Using Invasive and Noninvasive Methods of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Hassett, Catherine E.
    Uysal, S. Pinar
    Butler, Robert
    Moore, Nina Z.
    Cardim, Danilo
    Gomes, Joao A.
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2023, 38 (03) : 591 - 599
  • [3] Adaptive noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation
    Schmidt, B
    Czosnyka, M
    Raabe, A
    Yahya, H
    Schwarze, JJ
    Sackerer, D
    Sander, D
    Klingelhöfer, J
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [4] Noninvasive monitoring of intracranial pressure
    Paulat, K
    Maur, U
    Brucher, R
    Russell, D
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (01) : 337 - 337
  • [5] Noninvasive monitoring of intracranial pressure
    Popovic, Djordje
    Khoo, Michael
    Lee, Stefan
    Recent Patents on Biomedical Engineering, 2009, 2 (03): : 165 - 179
  • [6] The Future of Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
    Luis Pinedo-Portilla, Juan
    REVISTA DEL CUERPO MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL NACIONAL ALMANZOR AGUINAGA ASENJO, 2021, 14 (01): : 108 - 109
  • [7] NONINVASIVE INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING
    PITLYK, PJ
    PIANTANIDA, TP
    PLOEGER, DW
    NEUROSURGERY, 1985, 17 (04) : 581 - 584
  • [8] Beyond intracranial pressure: monitoring cerebral perfusion and autoregulation in severe traumatic brain injury
    Dietvorst, Sofie
    Depreitere, Bart
    Meyfroidt, Geert
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 29 (02) : 85 - 88
  • [9] Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring
    Canac, Nicolas
    Jalaleddini, Kian
    Thorpe, Samuel G.
    Thibeault, Corey M.
    Hamilton, Robert B.
    FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [10] Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring in women with migraine
    Rossi, Denise Martineli
    Bevilaqua-Grossi, Debora
    Mascarenhas, Sergio
    Dutra de Souza, Hugo Celso
    Carvalho, Gabriela Ferreira
    Carmona Vendramim, Ana Carolina
    Philbois, Stella Vieira
    Dach, Fabiola
    Tallarico, Francisco Jose
    de Oliveira, Anamaria Siriani
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)