Framework for evaluating statistical models in physics education research

被引:7
|
作者
Aiken, John M. [1 ,2 ]
De Bin, Riccardo [3 ]
Lewandowski, H. J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Caballero, Marcos D. [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ctr Comp Sci Educ, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Math, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] NIST, JILA, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[8] Michigan State Univ, Dept Computat Math Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[9] Michigan State Univ, CREATE STEM Inst, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
IMPUTATION; IMPUTE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020104
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Across the field of education research there has been an increased focus on the development, critique, and evaluation of statistical methods and data usage due to recently created, very large datasets and machine learning techniques. In physics education research (PER), this increased focus has recently been shown through the 2019 Physical Review PER Focused Collection examining quantitative methods in PER. Quantitative PER has provided strong arguments for reforming courses by including interactive engagement, demonstrated that students often move away from scientistlike views due to science education, and has injected robust assessment into the physics classroom via concept inventories. The work presented here examines the impact that machine learning may have on physics education research, presents a framework for the entire process including data management, model evaluation, and results communication, and demonstrates the utility of this framework through the analysis of two types of survey data.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Framework to Support Practitioners in Evaluating Business-IT Alignment Models Completed Research Paper
    El-Mekawy, Mohamed
    Perjons, Erik
    Rusu, Lazar
    AMCIS 2013 PROCEEDINGS, 2013,
  • [32] Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Prediction Models Are Uninformative as to Clinical Value: Towards a Decision Analytic Framework
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [33] Bayesian statistical approaches to evaluating cognitive models
    Annis, Jeffrey
    Palmeri, Thomas J.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2018, 9 (02)
  • [34] NEW STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING LONGITUDINAL MODELS
    MURRAY, JR
    WILEY, DE
    WOLFE, RG
    HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1971, 14 (02) : 142 - &
  • [35] Physics Education Research Section (PERS)
    Tobochnik, J
    Redish, EF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2002, 70 (07) : 666 - 666
  • [36] Racial equity in physics education research
    Cochran, Geraldine L.
    Hyater-Adams, Simone
    Rodriguez, Miguel
    Cid, Ximena C.
    Sachmpazidi, Diana
    Rosa, Katemari
    Barthelemy, Ramon S.
    NATURE PHYSICS, 2024, 20 (03) : 336 - 338
  • [37] Physics education research in an engineering context
    Kautz, Christian H.
    2006 Physics Education Research Conference, 2007, 883 : 22 - 25
  • [38] On the interaction of physics with science education research
    Hewson, Peter W.
    2016 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2016, : 18 - 22
  • [39] Physics Education Research Funding Census
    Henderson, Charles
    Barthelemy, Ramon
    Finkelstein, Noah
    Mestre, Jose
    2011 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2012, 1413 : 211 - 214
  • [40] Papers in Physics Education Research: 1999
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2000, 68 (07) : S62 - S63