Framework for evaluating statistical models in physics education research

被引:7
|
作者
Aiken, John M. [1 ,2 ]
De Bin, Riccardo [3 ]
Lewandowski, H. J. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Caballero, Marcos D. [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ctr Comp Sci Educ, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Math, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] NIST, JILA, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[7] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[8] Michigan State Univ, Dept Computat Math Sci & Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[9] Michigan State Univ, CREATE STEM Inst, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
IMPUTATION; IMPUTE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020104
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Across the field of education research there has been an increased focus on the development, critique, and evaluation of statistical methods and data usage due to recently created, very large datasets and machine learning techniques. In physics education research (PER), this increased focus has recently been shown through the 2019 Physical Review PER Focused Collection examining quantitative methods in PER. Quantitative PER has provided strong arguments for reforming courses by including interactive engagement, demonstrated that students often move away from scientistlike views due to science education, and has injected robust assessment into the physics classroom via concept inventories. The work presented here examines the impact that machine learning may have on physics education research, presents a framework for the entire process including data management, model evaluation, and results communication, and demonstrates the utility of this framework through the analysis of two types of survey data.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Connecting research in physics education with teacher education
    Yeo, S
    Treagust, D
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 84 (05) : 685 - 687
  • [22] Evaluating generative models in high energy physics
    Kansal, Raghav
    Li, Anni
    Duarte, Javier
    Chernyavskaya, Nadezda
    Pierini, Maurizio
    Orzari, Breno
    Tomei, Thiago
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (07)
  • [23] Statistical physics models for nacre fracture simulation
    Nukala, PKVV
    Simunovic, S
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2005, 72 (04):
  • [24] Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity
    Luginbuhl, Molly
    Rundle, John B.
    Turcotte, Donald L.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2019, 377 (2136):
  • [25] Participatory Action Research in Physics Education Research
    Rosenblatt, Rebecca
    2024 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, PERC, 2024, : 367 - 372
  • [26] A SOCIOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING GUIDANCE EDUCATION
    SCHLOSSBERG, NK
    PERSONNEL AND GUIDANCE JOURNAL, 1963, 42 (03): : 285 - 289
  • [27] The impact of the results of education research in physics on the physics classroom
    Pesa, MA
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE FISICA, 2003, 49 : 36 - 39
  • [28] Evaluation framework for statistical user models
    Calle, Javier
    Castaño, Leonardo
    Castro, Elena
    Cuadra, Dolores
    1600, Springer Verlag (217): : 449 - 456
  • [29] A Framework for the Evaluation of Statistical Prediction Models
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Gerds, Thomas A.
    CHEST, 2020, 158 (01) : S29 - S38
  • [30] Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: A review of hierarchical linear modeling
    Van Dusen, Ben
    Nissen, Jayson
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (02):