Single-stage versus two-stage reconstruction in chronic multi ligament knee injury

被引:1
|
作者
Khan, Mohammad Jesan [1 ]
Asif, Naiyer [1 ]
Sharma, Anubhav [1 ]
Siddiqui, Yasir Salam [1 ]
Khan, Abdul Qayyum [1 ]
机构
[1] AMU, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, JN Med Coll, Aligarh 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
关键词
Multi ligament knee injury; single-stage; two-stage; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ASSISTED COMBINED ANTERIOR; POSTEROLATERAL CORNER; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; MIDTERM OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; DISLOCATION; GRAFT; REPAIR; PCL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Multi ligament knee injury (MLKI) refers to the disruption of at least 2 of the 4 major knee ligaments. These injuries are managed in single and two-stage surgeries however, treatment guidelines for best practice are unsettled. There is no study in the literature that compares single and two-stage surgery for the management of chronic multiligament knee injury. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome between single-stage and two-stage surgical fixation in chronic multi-ligament knee injury. Methods: Twenty seven patients with chronic MLKI with at least 2 years of follow up were included. Fourteen patients underwent reconstruction of torn ligaments in a single-stage operation (Group I) and 13 patients underwent reconstruction of torn ligaments in two stages (Group II). Assessment of clinical outcome was done with IKDC knee score, TEGNER LYSHOLM knee score, range of movement and laxity tests (Anterior drawer test, Lachman, Posterior drawer test, pivot shift test, dial test, varus and valgus stress test). Results: At final follow up, there was no significant difference in post-operative IKDC knee scores in group I and group II (84.7 +/- 7.1 and 81.4 +/- 8.4 respectively, p=0.3) and Lysholm scores (85.8 +/- 8.3 and 80.9 +/- 8.3 respectively, p=0.1), range of movement (133.2 +/- 5.7 and 131.5 +/- 6.6 respectively, p=0.5) and all the patients regained full extension. At the final follow up 12/14 patients (85.7%) in group I and 11/13 patients (84.6%) in group II had a negative/grade 1 anterior drawer test (p=0.6), 14/14 (100%) in group I and 13/13 (100%) patients had negative/grade 1 lachman test (p=0.6), 13/14 patients (92.8%) in group I and 13/13 patients (100%) patients in group II had negative/grade 1 pivot shift test (p=0.4), 9/10 patients (90%) in group I and 12/13 patients (92.3%) in group II had negative/grade 1 posterior drawer (p=0.6), 6/6 patients (100%) in group I and 6/7 patients (85.7%) in group II had negative/grade 1 dial test (p=0.3), 5/6 patients (83.3%) in group I and 5/7 patients (71.4%) in group II had negative/grade 1 varus stress test (p=0.4), 6/7 patients (85.7%) in group I and 7/7 patients (100%) in group II had negative/grade 1 valgus stress test (p=0.1). Conclusion: Chronic MLKI managed by single stage and two stage reconstruction provides similar functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A cost analysis of single-stage bilateral versus two-stage direct anterior total hip arthroplasty
    Martin, Glynn R.
    Marsh, Jacquelyn D.
    Vasarhelyi, Edward M.
    Howard, Jamie L.
    Lanting, Brent A.
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [32] Bariatric Surgery In The Super-Super Obese - Single-Stage Versus Two-Stage Procedures.
    Mannur, Kesava Reddy
    Mukherjee, Samrat
    Thomas, Harun
    Devalia, Kalpana
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2010, 20 (08) : 991 - 991
  • [33] Two-stage versus single-stage procedure for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in elderly patients: a retrospectively cohort study
    Zhou, Yong
    Zha, Wen-Zhang
    Fan, Ren-Gen
    Jiang, Guo-qin
    Wu, Xu-dong
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2019, 111 (03) : 176 - 181
  • [34] Risk of Malocclusion Among Patients Undergoing Single-Stage Versus Two-Stage Cleft Palate Repair
    McCrary, Hilary
    Torrecillas, Vanessa
    Pollard, Sarah Hatch
    Collingridge, Dave S.
    Yamashiro, Duane
    Skirko, Jonathan R.
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2022, 59 (10): : 1271 - 1278
  • [35] Short to Mid-term Outcomes of Single-stage Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injury
    Bagherifard, Abolfazl
    Jabalameli, Mahmoud
    Ghaffari, Salman
    Rezazadeh, Jafar
    Abedi, Majid
    Mirkazemi, Masoud
    Aghamohamadi, Javad
    Hesabi, Afshin
    Mohammadpour, Mehdi
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2019, 7 (04): : 346 - 353
  • [36] Evaluation of chronic perilunate dislocations: A comparative study of single-stage, two-stage ORIF, and salvage procedures
    Dhal, Anil
    Prakash, Saket
    Khan, Yasim
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55
  • [37] VOLUME AND MASS COMPARISON OF TWO-STAGE COAXIAL REDUCTION GEARS WITH SINGLE-STAGE AND TWO-STAGE PLANETARY REDUCTION GEARS
    Gregov, Goran
    Lovrin, Neven
    Vrcan, Zeljko
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF FAMENA, 2010, 34 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [38] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction
    Magda Rizer
    Gregory Brian Foremny
    Augustus Rush
    Adam D. Singer
    Michael Baraga
    Lee D. Kaplan
    Jean Jose
    [J]. Skeletal Radiology, 2017, 46 : 161 - 169
  • [39] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction
    Rizer, Magda
    Foremny, Gregory Brian
    Rush, Augustus, III
    Singer, Adam D.
    Baraga, Michael
    Kaplan, Lee D.
    Jose, Jean
    [J]. SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [40] Detection of sperm cells by single-stage and two-stage deep object detectors
    Yuzkat, Mecit
    Ilhan, Hamza Osman
    Aydin, Nizamettin
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2023, 83