Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes

被引:41
|
作者
Bekiari, Eleni [1 ,2 ]
Rizava, Chrysoula [1 ]
Athanasiadou, Eleni [1 ]
Papatheodorou, Konstantinos [2 ,3 ]
Liakos, Aris [1 ]
Karagiannis, Thomas [1 ]
Mainou, Maria [1 ]
Rika, Maria [2 ]
Boura, Panagiota [4 ]
Tsapas, Apostolos [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Clin Res & Evidence Based Med Unit, Dept Med 2, Hippokratio Gen Hosp, 49 Konstantinoupoleos St, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Ctr Diabet, Dept Med 2, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
[3] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Med 2, Alexandroupolis, Greece
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Med 2, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
[5] Univ Oxford, Harris Manchester Coll, Oxford, England
关键词
Vildagliptin; DPP-4; inhibitors; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; DRUG-NAIVE PATIENTS; IMPROVES GLYCEMIC CONTROL; SEVERE RENAL IMPAIRMENT; BETA-CELL FUNCTION; ADD-ON THERAPY; DPP-4 INHIBITOR VILDAGLIPTIN; DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITORS; INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT TARGETS; METFORMIN COMBINATION THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS;
D O I
10.1007/s12020-015-0841-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an update on the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We searched MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE and the drug manufacturer's website for randomised controlled trials of vildagliptin in patients with T2DM. Sixty-nine studies (28,006 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo vildagliptin reduced HbA(1c) (weighted mean difference WMD -0.69 %; 95 % CI -0.83 to -0.56 %; I (2) = 82 %), and it was as effective as other antidiabetic agents (WMD -0.01 %; 95 % CI -0.16 to 0.14 %; I (2) = 93 %), without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia (OR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.59 to 1.16; I (2) = 0 % vs. placebo, and OR 0.19; 95 % CI 0.15 to 0.24; I (2) = 78 % versus active comparators). However, it was associated with an increase in the incidence of arthralgia compared with other comparators (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.02 to 1.48; I (2) = 0 %). On the contrary, vildagliptin did not increase the incidence of pancreatitis (OR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.37 to 2.53; I (2) = 0 %), serious adverse events (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.88 to 1.09; I (2) = 0 %) or death (OR 1.10, 95 % CI 0.75 to 1.61; I (2) = 0 %). Finally, odds ratio (OR) for heart failure, and overall cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was 0.77 (95 % CI 0.46 to 1.30; I (2) = 0 %) and 0.91 (95 % CI 0.73 to 1.14; I (2) = 0 %), respectively. Vildagliptin is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with T2DM, both as monotherapy and as add-on treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 480
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] iGlarLixi for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Yang
    Li, Congxin
    Li, Xuejing
    Yang, Jie
    Zheng, Yingying
    Li, Fan
    Wang, Xianying
    ENDOCRINE, 2024, 86 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [12] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of lixisenatide in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes
    Schmidt, L. J.
    Habacher, W.
    Augustin, T.
    Krahulec, E.
    Semlitsch, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2014, 16 (09): : 769 - 779
  • [13] The effect of spirulina on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hatami, Elaheh
    Ghalishourani, Samira-Sadat
    Najafgholizadeh, Ameneh
    Pourmasoumi, Makan
    Hadi, Amir
    Clark, Cain C. T.
    Assaroudi, Mostafa
    Salehi-sahlabadi, Ammar
    Joukar, Farahnaz
    Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2021, 20 (01) : 883 - 892
  • [14] Fatigue in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ba, Junqiang
    Chen, Yuan
    Liu, Daishun
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 43 (02) : 172 - 181
  • [15] Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in Japan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goto, Atsushi
    Goto, Maki
    Noda, Mitsuhiko
    Tsugane, Shoichiro
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [16] The effect of spirulina on type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elaheh Hatami
    Samira-Sadat Ghalishourani
    Ameneh Najafgholizadeh
    Makan Pourmasoumi
    Amir Hadi
    Cain C. T. Clark
    Mostafa Assaroudi
    Ammar Salehi-sahlabadi
    Farahnaz Joukar
    Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 2021, 20 : 883 - 892
  • [17] Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Han, Cheng
    He, Xue
    Xia, Xinghai
    Li, Yongze
    Shi, Xiaoguang
    Shan, Zhongyan
    Teng, Weiping
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [18] Schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Kai
    Wang, Shenghai
    Qu, Chunhui
    Zheng, Kewei
    Sun, Ping
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [19] Opium use and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Piraiee, Elahe
    Hassanipour, Soheil
    Shojaie, Layla
    Vali, Mohebat
    Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Ghaem, Haleh
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2022, 27 (05) : 452 - 458
  • [20] Semaglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andreadis, Panagiotis
    Karagiannis, Thomas
    Malandris, Konstantinos
    Avgerinos, Ioannis
    Liakos, Aris
    Manolopoulos, Apostolos
    Bekiari, Eleni
    Matthews, David R.
    Tsapas, Apostolos
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (09): : 2255 - 2263