Machine Learning for Better Trace Chemical Detection

被引:2
|
作者
DeWitt, Kristin [1 ]
机构
[1] IARPA, 5850 Univ Res Court, Riverdale Pk, MD 20737 USA
关键词
predict chemical signatures; particle size; morphology; particle shape; crystallinity; machine learning; chemical detection algorithm; Mie scattering; REFLECTANCE; SCATTERING; SPHERE;
D O I
10.1117/12.2516810
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
One of the biggest challenges facing standoff chemical detection is the ability to accurately predict spectral influences on chemical signatures that are caused by factors such as particle size, particle shape, deposition thickness, or mesoscale crystallinity and morphology. Currently, most chemical detection algorithms treat each substrate/sorbate combination as a separate library entry that must be empirically measured. Physics-based or semi-empirical models work fairly well for fitting spectra and qualitatively mapping features and trends, but are much less accurate for quantitatively predictions, and are too computationally intensive for real-time development of field libraries for practical instruments. IARPA's MORGOTH'S CROWN prize challenge was a crowdsourced effort to encourage new approaches to infrared spectral modeling to quantitatively predict trace spectra on surfaces from bulk reflectance spectra. Challenge participants were given a training set which included reflectance spectra of sample coupons with trace chemical residues on them, including examples with different particle sizes, crystal structures, and mass loadings. Participants were then asked to generate an algorithm to predict what the spectra of different combinations of chemicals and substrates would look like. The results of the MORGOTH'S CROWN challenge showed that machine-learning based algorithms were better able to quantitatively predict new spectra than physics-based models. The article will describe the execution of the MORGOTH'S CROWN challenge, and discuss the "bigger picture" of what the MORGOTH'S CROWN results mean, and where we "go from here".
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning in chemical reaction space
    Stocker, Sina
    Csanyi, Gabor
    Reuter, Karsten
    Margraf, Johannes T.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [42] Machine learning in chemical reaction space
    Sina Stocker
    Gábor Csányi
    Karsten Reuter
    Johannes T. Margraf
    Nature Communications, 11
  • [43] Machine Learning Applications for Chemical Reactions
    Park, Sanggil
    Han, Herim
    Kim, Hyungjun
    Choi, Sunghwan
    CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL, 2022, 17 (14)
  • [44] Machine Learning in Chemical Engineering: A Perspective
    Schweidtmann, Artur M.
    Esche, Erik
    Fischer, Asja
    Kloft, Marius
    Repke, Jens-Uwe
    Sager, Sebastian
    Mitsos, Alexander
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2021, 93 (12) : 2029 - 2039
  • [45] Machine learning meets chemical physics
    Ceriotti, Michele
    Clementi, Cecilia
    Anatole von Lilienfeld, O.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 154 (16):
  • [46] Constructing New and Better Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning
    Huang, Jin
    Ling, Charles X.
    20TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, : 859 - 864
  • [47] For Better or Worse? Revenue Forecasting with Machine Learning Approaches
    Chung, Il Hwan
    Williams, Daniel W.
    Do, Myung Rok
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 45 (05) : 1133 - 1154
  • [48] Can Machine Learning Be Better than Biased Readers?
    Hibi, Atsuhiro
    Zhu, Rui
    Tyrrell, Pascal N.
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (03) : 901 - 908
  • [49] Envisioning better benchmarks for machine learning PDE solvers
    Brandstetter, Johannes
    NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 7 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [50] Machine learning methods for better water quality prediction
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    Othman, Faridah Binti
    Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin
    Ibrahim, Rusul Khaleel
    Fai, Chow Ming
    Hossain, Md Shabbir
    Ehteram, Mohammad
    Elshafie, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 578