Integration at the Round Table: Marine Spatial Planning in Multi-Stakeholder Settings

被引:82
|
作者
Olsen, Erik [1 ]
Fluharty, David [2 ]
Hoel, Alf Hakon [3 ]
Hostens, Kristian [4 ]
Maes, Frank [5 ]
Pecceu, Ellen [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Marine Res, N-5024 Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Marine & Environm Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Inst Marine Res, Tromso, Norway
[4] ILVO Inst Agr & Fisheries Res, Oostende, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Maritime Inst, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; POLICY; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0109964
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Marine spatial planning (MSP) is often considered as a pragmatic approach to implement an ecosystem based management in order to manage marine space in a sustainable way. This requires the involvement of multiple actors and stakeholders at various governmental and societal levels. Several factors affect how well the integrated management of marine waters will be achieved, such as different governance settings (division of power between central and local governments), economic activities (and related priorities), external drivers, spatial scales, incentives and objectives, varying approaches to legislation and political will. We compared MSP in Belgium, Norway and the US to illustrate how the integration of stakeholders and governmental levels differs among these countries along the factors mentioned above. Horizontal integration (between sectors) is successful in all three countries, achieved through the use of neutral 'round-table' meeting places for all actors. Vertical integration between government levels varies, with Belgium and Norway having achieved full integration while the US lacks integration of the legislature due to sharp disagreements among stakeholders and unsuccessful partisan leadership. Success factors include political will and leadership, process transparency and stakeholder participation, and should be considered in all MSP development processes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning needs assessment for multi-stakeholder implementation science training in LMIC settings: findings and recommendations
    Turner, Mallory Wolfe
    Bogdewic, Stephanie
    Agha, Erum
    Blanchard, Carrie
    Sturke, Rachel
    Pettifor, Audrey
    Salisbury, Kathryn
    Marques, Andrea Horvath
    Excellent, Marie Lina
    Rajagopal, Nitya
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [22] Learning needs assessment for multi-stakeholder implementation science training in LMIC settings: Findings and recommendations
    Turner, Mallory
    Bogdewic, Stephanie
    Agha, Erum
    Blanchard, Carrie
    Sturke, Rachel
    Pettifor, Audrey
    Salisbury, Kathryn
    Marques, Andrea
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (SUPPL 1):
  • [23] Sustainable Fishing and Aquaculture Activities in the Atlantic Coast of the Portuguese North Region: Multi-Stakeholder Views as a Tool for Maritime Spatial Planning
    Salas-Leiton, Emilio
    Vieira, Luis R.
    Guilhermino, Lucia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 17
  • [24] Research on investment planning of power-hydrogen system considering the multi-stakeholder benefit
    Shi, Mengshu
    Huang, Yuansheng
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 199 : 1408 - 1423
  • [25] Risk-Aware Multi-stakeholder Next Release Planning Using Multi-objective Optimization
    Pitangueira, Antonio Mauricio
    Tonella, Paolo
    Susi, Angelo
    Maciel, Rita Suzana
    Barros, Marcio
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2016, 2016, 9619 : 3 - 18
  • [26] Synchronously Decentralized Adaptive Robust Planning Method for Multi-Stakeholder Integrated Energy Systems
    Pan, Guangsheng
    Gu, Wei
    Zhou, Suyang
    Wu, Zhi
    Qiu, Haifeng
    Lu, Yuping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 11 (03) : 1128 - 1139
  • [27] Investigating Tools for Multi-Stakeholder Decision Making to Improve the Spatial Performance in Transport Interchanges
    Tompson, Tim
    Haeusler, M. Hank
    ECAADE 2013: COMPUTATION AND PERFORMANCE, VOL 1, 2013, : 233 - 242
  • [28] 'A system that works for the sea'? Exploring Stakeholder Engagement in Marine Spatial Planning
    Ritchie, Heather
    Ellis, Geraint
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 53 (06) : 701 - 723
  • [29] Effective integration and integrative capacity in marine spatial planning
    Joanna Vince
    Jon C. Day
    Maritime Studies, 2020, 19 : 317 - 332
  • [30] Integration of fisheries into marine spatial planning: Quo vadis?
    Janssen, Holger
    Bastardie, Francois
    Eero, Margit
    Hamon, Katell G.
    Hinrichsen, Hans-Harald
    Marchal, Paul
    Nielsen, J. Rasmus
    Le Pape, Olivier
    Schulze, Torsten
    Simons, Sarah
    Teal, Lorna R.
    Tidd, Alex
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 201 : 105 - 113