Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer

被引:38
|
作者
Hwang, Sunah S. [1 ]
Dukhovny, Dmitry [2 ]
Gopal, Daksha [3 ]
Cabral, Howard [3 ]
Diop, Hafsatou [4 ]
Coddington, Charles C. [5 ]
Stern, Judy E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Neonatol, 13121 East 17th Ave,Educ 2 South,Mailstop 8402, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Pediat, 3181 Sw Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Dept Publ Hlth, Off Data Translat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Atrium Hlth, Carolinas Med Ctr, Div Reprod Med, Charlotte, NC USA
[6] Dartmouth Hitchcock, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Pathol, Lebanon, NH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Birth outcomes; newborn; in vitro fertilization; assisted reproductive technology; FET; fresh embryo transfer; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BODY-MASS INDEX; UNITED-STATES; BIRTH OUTCOMES; CHILDREN BORN; POPULATION; VITRIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE; INFERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare neonatal health outcomes after fresh versus frozen ET (FET). Design: Retrospective analysis of a population-based database of linked clinically assisted reproductive technology (ART) data with state vital records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between deliveries from fresh versus FET and adverse health outcomes, controlling for maternal characteristics. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Live-born singleton infants born to Massachusetts women who conceived by fresh or FET after ART using autologous oocytes between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal mortality, birth defects, organ system conditions. Result(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh embryos, those born to mothers who underwent FET were less likely to be small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.70) and low birth weight (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) but more likely to be large for gestational age (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70) and to experience greater odds of infectious disease (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), respiratory (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41), and neurologic (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68) conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth defects, cardiovascular, hematologic, and gastrointestinal/feeding conditions, and for infants >= 35 weeks, no statistically significant differences in prolonged hospital stay (>3 days for vaginal delivery, >5 days for cesarean). Conclusion(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh ET, those born by FET have higher birth weight but increased odds of infectious disease, hematologic, respiratory, and neurologic abnormalities. These risks should be considered when making decisions on fresh versus FET. (C) 2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 907
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparative Study of Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer and their Outcomes in Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
    Sawal, Anupama
    Yadgire, Geetanjali
    Thute, Preeti
    Chaudhary, Kirti
    Bokariya, Pradeep
    Fulmali, Darshana
    JOURNAL OF THE ANATOMICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2024, 73 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [22] To delay or not to delay a frozen embryo transfer after a failed fresh embryo transfer attempt?
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    Siffain, Johannie
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    van de Vijver, Arne
    van Landuyt, Lisbet
    Stoop, Dominic
    Tournaye, Herman
    Blockeel, Christophe
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (05) : 1202 - +
  • [23] Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer with GnRH-antagonist protocol in ART
    Choi, D.
    Yang, H.
    Park, J. H.
    Jung, J. H.
    Hwang, H. G.
    Lee, J. H.
    Lee, J. E.
    Kang, A. S.
    Yoo, J. H.
    Kwon, H. C.
    Lee, S. J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 182 - 183
  • [24] Comparison of birth weights of children born after slow frozen embryo replacement versus fresh embryo transfer
    Maris, E.
    Ferrieres-Hoa, A.
    Gala, A.
    Coffy, A.
    Vintejoux, E.
    Ranisavljevic, N.
    Hamamah, S.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2019, 47 (03): : 305 - 310
  • [25] Frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer: Clinical outcomes depend on the number of oocytes retrieved
    Xu, Bing
    He, Ya-qiong
    Wang, Yuan
    Lu, Yao
    Hong, Yan
    Wang, Yao
    Sun, Yun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 215 : 50 - 54
  • [26] Ectopic Pregnancy Rates after Frozen versus Fresh Embryo Transfer: A Meta-Analysis
    Jee, Byung Chul
    Suh, Chang Suk
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2009, 68 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [27] Comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with frozen and fresh embryo transfers at term pregnancy Frozen and fresh embryo transfer results
    Horasanli, Jule Eric
    Energin, Hasan
    Ferlibas, Enes
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 13 (05): : 588 - 591
  • [28] ART outcomes in endometriosis-affected women after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a matched cohort study
    Santulli, P.
    Bourdon, M.
    Gayet, V.
    Marcellin, L.
    Maignien, C.
    Blanchet, V.
    Gonnot, J.
    Chapron, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 112 - 112
  • [29] Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes
    Rafael, Filipa
    Molla Robles, Guillermo
    Navarro, Alfredo T.
    Garrido, Nicolas
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan A.
    Bosch, Ernesto
    Gouveia Nunes, Sofia
    Reis Soares, Sergio
    Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (07) : 1642 - 1651
  • [30] Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles
    Abbas Aflatoonian
    Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam
    Mehri Mashayekhy
    Farnaz Mohamadian
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2010, 27 : 695 - 700