Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer

被引:38
|
作者
Hwang, Sunah S. [1 ]
Dukhovny, Dmitry [2 ]
Gopal, Daksha [3 ]
Cabral, Howard [3 ]
Diop, Hafsatou [4 ]
Coddington, Charles C. [5 ]
Stern, Judy E. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Neonatol, 13121 East 17th Ave,Educ 2 South,Mailstop 8402, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Pediat, 3181 Sw Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Dept Publ Hlth, Off Data Translat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Atrium Hlth, Carolinas Med Ctr, Div Reprod Med, Charlotte, NC USA
[6] Dartmouth Hitchcock, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Pathol, Lebanon, NH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Birth outcomes; newborn; in vitro fertilization; assisted reproductive technology; FET; fresh embryo transfer; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; BODY-MASS INDEX; UNITED-STATES; BIRTH OUTCOMES; CHILDREN BORN; POPULATION; VITRIFICATION; SURVEILLANCE; INFERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare neonatal health outcomes after fresh versus frozen ET (FET). Design: Retrospective analysis of a population-based database of linked clinically assisted reproductive technology (ART) data with state vital records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between deliveries from fresh versus FET and adverse health outcomes, controlling for maternal characteristics. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Live-born singleton infants born to Massachusetts women who conceived by fresh or FET after ART using autologous oocytes between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal mortality, birth defects, organ system conditions. Result(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh embryos, those born to mothers who underwent FET were less likely to be small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.70) and low birth weight (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) but more likely to be large for gestational age (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70) and to experience greater odds of infectious disease (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), respiratory (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41), and neurologic (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68) conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth defects, cardiovascular, hematologic, and gastrointestinal/feeding conditions, and for infants >= 35 weeks, no statistically significant differences in prolonged hospital stay (>3 days for vaginal delivery, >5 days for cesarean). Conclusion(s): Compared with infants conceived from fresh ET, those born by FET have higher birth weight but increased odds of infectious disease, hematologic, respiratory, and neurologic abnormalities. These risks should be considered when making decisions on fresh versus FET. (C) 2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 907
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Perinatal and maternal outcomes after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer cycles in women of advanced maternal age
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Bai, Lina
    Ren, Haiqin
    Liu, Xinyu
    Guo, Shuaishuai
    Xu, Peng
    Zheng, Jia
    Zheng, Liqiang
    Tan, Jichun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 257 : 133 - 137
  • [12] Reproductive outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Shoukry, Ahmed
    Gazeirly, Wael Samir El
    Khattab, Mohamed Abdelkader
    Abdelmoneim, Hesham Mahmoud Adel
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [13] clinical outcome of frozen embryo transfer versus fresh embryo transfer of 3129 cycles
    Liu, J.
    Guoning, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 214 - 214
  • [14] PERINATAL OUTCOMES AFTER FRESH VERSUS FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFERS.
    Badalotti, Mariangela
    Flach, Shana
    Hentschke, Marta Ribeiro
    Wingert, Fabiana
    Azambuja, Ricardo
    Trindade, Vanessa Devens
    Okada, Lilian
    Tagliani-Ribeiro, Alice
    Proenca, Leticia Auler
    Cunegatto, Bibiana
    Petracco, Alvaro
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E298 - E298
  • [15] FROZEN VERSUS FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER IN OVULATORY WOMEN.
    Chen, Z.
    Shi, Y.
    Wei, D.
    Zhang, H.
    Wang, Z.
    Li, J.
    Legro, R. S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E166 - E167
  • [16] FROZEN VERSUS FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER IN WOMEN WITH LOW PROGNOSIS
    Wei, Daimin
    Wang, Ze
    Zhao, Han
    Yan, Junhao
    Zhang, Heping
    Legro, Richard S.
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2024, 122 (04) : E131 - E132
  • [17] Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in PCOS: Arguments for and Against
    Wei, Daimin
    Ma, Jinlong
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (04) : 359 - 363
  • [18] PERINATAL AND MATERNAL OUTCOMES AFTER FROZEN VERSUS FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES IN WOMEN OF ADVANCED MATERNAL AGE.
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Tan, Jichun
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E313 - E313
  • [19] Maternal and perinatal outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer-what is the risk-benefit ratio?
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) : 241 - 243
  • [20] Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes for Fresh versus Frozen-thrawed embryo transfer in women with endometriosis
    Sebbag, L.
    Bourdon, M.
    Maignien, C.
    Marcellin, L.
    Santulli, P.
    Chapron, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 285 - 285