Does sweeping of the membranes reduce the need for formal induction of labour? A randomised controlled trial

被引:30
|
作者
Boulvain, M
Fraser, WD
Marcoux, S
Fontaine, JY
Bazin, S
Pinault, JJ
Blouin, D
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Univ Sante Estrie, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Hop St Sacrement, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09347.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of sweeping of the membranes to reduce the need for a formal induction of labour: 2. to evaluate the side effects of this intervention. Design A randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting Three tertiary care hospitals of the province of Quebec, Canada. Population Two hundred women for whom non-urgent induction of labour was medically indicated. Methods Women were randomly allocated to sweeping of membranes, or vaginal examination for Bishop scoring only. Main outcome measures 1. Cumulative incidence and relative risk of induction of labour by either oxytocin, prostaglandins or amniotomy; 2. women's discomfort and side effects attributable to sweeping of the membranes. Results Women allocated to sweeping of the membranes required formal induction of labour less frequently than women in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (49% vs 60%, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07). Pain during vaginal examination and other side effects were more frequently reported by women allocated to the sweeping group. Conclusions The observed reduction in the need for formal induction of labour is smaller than in previous studies. Side effects and discomfort associated with sweeping of the membranes must be taken into account when counselling women who require induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term (The Digitat Trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Boers, Kim
    Vijgen, Sylvia
    Bijlenga, Denise
    Van Der Post, Joris
    Bekedam, Dick
    Kwee, Anneke
    Van Der Salm, Paulien
    Van Pampus, Marielle
    Spaanderman, Marc
    De Boer, Karin
    Duvekot, Hans
    Bremer, Henk
    Hasaart, Tom
    Delemarre, Friso
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    Van Meir, Claudia
    Willekes, Christine
    Wijnen, Ella
    Rijken, Monique
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Roumen, Frans
    Van Lith, Jan
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Scherjon, Sicco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S3 - S3
  • [42] Delayed versus immediate oxytocin infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour: A randomised controlled pilot trial
    Titulaer, Linde M. L.
    de Wolf, G. Sander
    Bakkum, Erica A.
    Moll, Etelka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 357 - 363
  • [43] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Griffiths, A. N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (13) : 1679 - 1679
  • [44] The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes - A randomized controlled trial
    Hill, Micah J.
    McWilliams, Grant D.
    Garcia-Sur, Denise
    Chen, Bruce
    Munroe, Michelle
    Hoeldtke, Nathan J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06): : 1313 - 1319
  • [45] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Taher, S. E.
    Inder, J. W.
    Soltan, S. A.
    Eliahoo, J.
    Edmonds, D. K.
    Bennett, P. R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (06) : 719 - 725
  • [46] Randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour
    Yenuberi, H.
    Abraham, A.
    Sebastian, A.
    Benjamin, S.
    Londhe, V
    Mathews, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 94 - 95
  • [47] Does suppressing luteinising hormone secretion reduce the miscarriage rate? Results of a randomised controlled trial
    Clifford, K
    Rai, R
    Watson, H
    Franks, S
    Regan, L
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7045): : 1508 - 1511
  • [48] Does Warming-Up Reduce the Risk of Injury to Golfers? A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
    Fradkin, Andrea
    Cameron, Peter
    Gabbe, Belinda
    Forbes, Andrew
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S349 - S350
  • [49] Does the Epi-NoA® Birth Trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial
    Shek, Ka Lai
    Chantarasorn, Varisara
    Langer, Susanne
    Phipps, Hala
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (12) : 1521 - 1528
  • [50] Evaluation of a bespoke training to increase uptake by midwifery teams of NICE Guidance for membrane sweeping to reduce induction of labour: a stepped wedge cluster randomised design
    Kenyon, Sara
    Dann, Sophie
    Hope, Lucy
    Clarke, Paula
    Hogan, Amanda
    Jenkinson, David
    Hemming, Karla
    TRIALS, 2017, 18