Does sweeping of the membranes reduce the need for formal induction of labour? A randomised controlled trial

被引:30
|
作者
Boulvain, M
Fraser, WD
Marcoux, S
Fontaine, JY
Bazin, S
Pinault, JJ
Blouin, D
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Univ Sante Estrie, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Hop St Sacrement, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09347.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of sweeping of the membranes to reduce the need for a formal induction of labour: 2. to evaluate the side effects of this intervention. Design A randomised controlled clinical trial. Setting Three tertiary care hospitals of the province of Quebec, Canada. Population Two hundred women for whom non-urgent induction of labour was medically indicated. Methods Women were randomly allocated to sweeping of membranes, or vaginal examination for Bishop scoring only. Main outcome measures 1. Cumulative incidence and relative risk of induction of labour by either oxytocin, prostaglandins or amniotomy; 2. women's discomfort and side effects attributable to sweeping of the membranes. Results Women allocated to sweeping of the membranes required formal induction of labour less frequently than women in the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (49% vs 60%, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.07). Pain during vaginal examination and other side effects were more frequently reported by women allocated to the sweeping group. Conclusions The observed reduction in the need for formal induction of labour is smaller than in previous studies. Side effects and discomfort associated with sweeping of the membranes must be taken into account when counselling women who require induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Induction of labour for predicted macrosomia: study protocol for the 'Big Baby' randomised controlled trial
    Ewington, Lauren Jade
    Gardosi, Jason
    Lall, Ranjit
    Underwood, Martin
    Fisher, Joanne D.
    Wood, Sara
    Griffin, Ryan
    Harris, Kirsten
    Bick, Debra
    Booth, Katie
    Brown, Jaclyn
    Butler, Emily
    Fowler, Kelly
    Williams, Mandy
    Deshpande, Sanjeev
    Gornall, Adam
    Dewdney, Jackie
    Hillyer, Karen
    Gates, Simon
    Jones, Ceri
    Mistry, Hema
    Petrou, Stavros
    Slowther, Anne-Marie
    Willis, Adrian
    Quenby, Siobhan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [22] Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial
    Lim, Sheri Ee-lin
    Tan, Toh Lick
    Ng, Grace Yang Huang
    Tagore, Shephali
    Kyaw, Ei Ei Phyo
    Yeo, George Seow Heong
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (08) : 419 - 424
  • [23] Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women
    Harrington, DJ
    MacKenzie, IZ
    Thompson, K
    Fleminger, M
    Greenwood, C
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [24] Using a birth ball to reduce pain perception in the latent phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial*
    Mylod, D. C. M.
    Hundley, V.
    Way, S.
    Clark, C.
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2024, 37 (02) : 379 - 386
  • [25] Does a hypnosis session reduce the required propofol dose during closed-loop anaesthesia induction? A randomised controlled trial
    Bataille, Aurelien
    Guirimand, Avit
    Szekely, Barbara
    Michel-Cherqui, Mireille
    Dumans, Virginie
    Liu, Ngai
    Chazot, Thierry
    Fischler, Marc
    Le Guen, Morgan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (09) : 675 - 681
  • [26] Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial
    Boulvain, Michel
    Senat, Marie-Victoire
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Beucher, Gael
    Subtil, Damien
    Bretelle, Florence
    Azria, Elie
    Hejaiej, Dominique
    Vendittelli, Francoise
    Capelle, Marianne
    Langer, Bruno
    Matis, Richard
    Connan, Laure
    Gillard, Philippe
    Kirkpatrick, Christine
    Ceysens, Gilles
    Faron, Gilles
    Irion, Olivier
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    LANCET, 2015, 385 (9987): : 2600 - 2605
  • [27] Intravaginal isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to induction of labour: A randomised controlled trial
    Haghighi, L.
    Homam, H.
    Raoofi, Z.
    Najmi, Z.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (03) : 272 - 276
  • [28] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
    Wise, Michelle R.
    Marriott, Joy
    Battin, Malcolm
    Thompson, John M. D.
    Stitely, Michael
    Sadler, Lynn
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [29] A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction
    Prager, M.
    Eneroth-Grimfors, E.
    Edlund, M.
    Marions, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1443 - 1450
  • [30] Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management for Large-for-Date Fetuses: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Boulvain, Michel
    Senat, Marie-Victoire
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Beucher, Gael
    Subtil, Damien
    Bretelle, Florence
    Azria, Elie
    Hejaiej, Dominique
    Vendittelli, Francoise
    Capelle, Marianne
    Langer, Bruno
    Matis, Richard
    Connan, Laure
    Gillard, Philippe
    Kirkpatrick, Christine
    Ceysens, Gilles
    Faron, Gilles
    Irion, Olivier
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (10) : 601 - 603