Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline

被引:3
|
作者
Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran [1 ]
Njoku, Paul [1 ]
Aben, Jean-Paul [2 ]
Ledoux, Leon [2 ]
Zhong, Liang [3 ]
Westenberg, Jos [4 ]
Swift, Andrew [5 ]
Archer, Gareth [5 ]
Wild, James [5 ]
Hose, Rod [5 ]
Flather, Marcus [1 ]
Vassiliou, Vassilios S. [1 ]
Garg, Pankaj [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich S10 2RX, Norfolk, England
[2] Pie Med Imaging, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Natl Heart Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Leids Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Cardiac MRI; Validation; VALVULAR HEART-DISEASE; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; STENOSIS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Doppler echocardiographic aortic valve peak velocity and peak pressure gradient assessment across the aortic valve (AV) is the mainstay for diagnosing aortic stenosis. Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) is emerging as a valuable diagnostic tool for estimating the peak pressure drop across the aortic valve, but assessment remains cumbersome. We aimed to validate a novel semi-automated pipeline 4D flow CMR method of assessing peak aortic value pressure gradient (AVPG) using the commercially available software solution, CAAS MR Solutions, against invasive angiographic methods. Results We enrolled 11 patients with severe AS on echocardiography from the EurValve programme. All patients had pre-intervention doppler echocardiography, invasive cardiac catheterisation with peak pressure drop assessment across the AV and 4D flow CMR. The peak AVPG was 51.9 +/- 35.2 mmHg using the invasive pressure drop method and 52.2 +/- 29.2 mmHg for the 4D flow CMR method (semi-automated pipeline), with good correlation between the two methods (r = 0.70, p = 0.017). Assessment of AVPG by 4D flow CMR using the novel semi-automated pipeline method shows excellent agreement to invasive assessment when compared to doppler-based methods and advocate for its use as complementary to echocardiography.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance 4D Flow: An in vitro Validation of Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Flow Volume Quantification
    Ghosn, Mohamad G.
    Jackson, Matthew S.
    Maragiannis, Dimitrios
    Chin, Karen
    Igo, Stephen R.
    Shah, Dipan
    Little, Stephen H.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [22] Validation of a fast semi-automated gradient calibration system for ICP-MS quantification of trace elements
    Hasenaecker, Frank
    Hirner, Alfred V.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2007, 22 (02) : 175 - 178
  • [23] Pressure Fields by Flow-Sensitive, 4D, Velocity-Encoded CMR in Patients With Aortic Coarctation
    Riesenkampff, Eugenie
    Fernandes, Joao Filipe
    Meier, Sebastian
    Goubergrits, Leonid
    Kropf, Siegfried
    Schubert, Stephan
    Berger, Felix
    Henneumuth, Anja
    Kuehne, Titus
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 7 (09) : 920 - 926
  • [24] Noninvasive quantification of cerebrovascular pressure changes using 4D Flow MRI
    Marlevi, David
    Schollenberger, Jonas
    Aristova, Maria
    Ferdian, Edward
    Ma, Yue
    Young, Alistair A.
    Edelman, Elazer R.
    Schnell, Susanne
    Figueroa, C. Alberto
    Nordsletten, David A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 86 (06) : 3096 - 3110
  • [25] Phantom validation of 4D flow: independent validation of flow velocity quantification using particle imaging velocimetry
    Johannes Töger
    Sebastian L Bidhult
    Johan Revstedt
    Marcus Carlsson
    Håkan Arheden
    Einar Heiberg
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17 (Suppl 1)
  • [26] SEMI-AUTOMATED DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF AORTIC ATHEROMAS FROM 3D TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    Tsang, Wendy
    Piazzese, Concetta
    Kronzon, Itzhak
    Sotaquira, Miguel
    Weinert, Lynn
    Lang, Roberto M.
    Caiani, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E974 - E974
  • [27] Pipeline for the Quantification of Cardiac Strain Based on Optical Flow using 4D Ultrasound Data
    Lorsakul, A.
    Duan, Q.
    Po, M.
    Hyodo, E.
    Wang, Y.
    Homma, S.
    Laine, A. F.
    2010 IEEE 36TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2010,
  • [28] Fast semi-automated analysis of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta using high temporal resolution 4D flow MRI
    Bruce Spottiswoode
    Aurelien F Stalder
    Mehmet A Gulsun
    Karissa F Campione
    Maria Carr
    Marie Wasielewski
    Michael Markl
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [29] Advanced Semi-Automated Display and Volume Computation for 4D Fetal Cardiac Images
    Tsutchek, Boris
    Sahn, David J.
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S597 - S597
  • [30] Direct mitral regurgitation quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 4D flow CMR jet tracking: evaluation in comparison to conventional CMR
    Aakash N. Gupta
    Ryan Avery
    Gilles Soulat
    Bradley D. Allen
    Jeremy D. Collins
    Lubna Choudhury
    Robert O. Bonow
    James Carr
    Michael Markl
    Mohammed S. M. Elbaz
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 23