Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline

被引:3
|
作者
Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran [1 ]
Njoku, Paul [1 ]
Aben, Jean-Paul [2 ]
Ledoux, Leon [2 ]
Zhong, Liang [3 ]
Westenberg, Jos [4 ]
Swift, Andrew [5 ]
Archer, Gareth [5 ]
Wild, James [5 ]
Hose, Rod [5 ]
Flather, Marcus [1 ]
Vassiliou, Vassilios S. [1 ]
Garg, Pankaj [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich S10 2RX, Norfolk, England
[2] Pie Med Imaging, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Natl Heart Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Leids Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Cardiac MRI; Validation; VALVULAR HEART-DISEASE; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; STENOSIS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-022-06033-z
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Doppler echocardiographic aortic valve peak velocity and peak pressure gradient assessment across the aortic valve (AV) is the mainstay for diagnosing aortic stenosis. Four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR) is emerging as a valuable diagnostic tool for estimating the peak pressure drop across the aortic valve, but assessment remains cumbersome. We aimed to validate a novel semi-automated pipeline 4D flow CMR method of assessing peak aortic value pressure gradient (AVPG) using the commercially available software solution, CAAS MR Solutions, against invasive angiographic methods. Results We enrolled 11 patients with severe AS on echocardiography from the EurValve programme. All patients had pre-intervention doppler echocardiography, invasive cardiac catheterisation with peak pressure drop assessment across the AV and 4D flow CMR. The peak AVPG was 51.9 +/- 35.2 mmHg using the invasive pressure drop method and 52.2 +/- 29.2 mmHg for the 4D flow CMR method (semi-automated pipeline), with good correlation between the two methods (r = 0.70, p = 0.017). Assessment of AVPG by 4D flow CMR using the novel semi-automated pipeline method shows excellent agreement to invasive assessment when compared to doppler-based methods and advocate for its use as complementary to echocardiography.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of aortic valve pressure gradient quantification using semi-automated 4D flow CMR pipeline
    Ciaran Grafton-Clarke
    Paul Njoku
    Jean-Paul Aben
    Leon Ledoux
    Liang Zhong
    Jos Westenberg
    Andrew Swift
    Gareth Archer
    James Wild
    Rod Hose
    Marcus Flather
    Vassilios S. Vassiliou
    Pankaj Garg
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [2] Multicenter Consistency Assessment of Valvular Flow Quantification With Automated Valve Tracking in 4D Flow CMR
    Juffermans, Joe F.
    Minderhoud, Savine C. S.
    Wittgren, Johan
    Kilburg, Anton
    Ese, Amir
    Fidock, Benjamin
    Zheng, Yu-Cong
    Zhang, Jun-Mei
    Blanken, Carmen P. S.
    Lamb, Hildo J.
    Goeman, Jelle J.
    Carlsson, Marcus
    Zhao, Shihua
    Planken, R. Nils
    van Ooij, Pim
    Zhong, Liang
    Chen, Xiuyu
    Garg, Pankaj
    Emrich, Tilman
    Hirsch, Alexander
    Toger, Johannes
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 14 (07) : 1354 - 1366
  • [3] 4D Flow MRI Pressure Mapping in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Feasibility Study With Comparison to Pressure Gradient Quantification
    Burns, Fiona
    Garcia, Julio
    Wu, Cody
    Bristow, Michael S.
    Gao, Xuexin
    Heydari, Bobak
    Lydell, Carmen
    Howarth, Andrew G.
    Fedak, Paul
    White, James A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [4] Remote CMR 4D Flow Quantification of Pulmonary Flow
    Raluca G Saru
    Kevin Wanambiro
    Albert Hsiao
    Laurens E Swart
    Sara Boccalini
    Mika Vogel
    Ricardo Budde
    Shreyas Vasanawala
    Jolien Roos-Hesselink
    Koen Nieman
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] 4D Flow CMR in Assessment of Valve-Related Ascending Aortic Disease
    Hope, Michael D.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Crook, Stephen E. S.
    Ordovas, Karen G.
    Urbania, Thomas H.
    Alley, Marc T.
    Higgins, Charles B.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2011, 4 (07) : 781 - 787
  • [6] Atlas-based analysis of 4D flow CMR: Automated vessel segmentation and flow quantification
    Bustamante, Mariana
    Petersson, Sven
    Eriksson, Jonatan
    Alehagen, Urban
    Dyverfeldt, Petter
    Carlhall, Carl-Johan
    Ebbers, Tino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17
  • [7] Atlas-based analysis of 4D flow CMR: Automated vessel segmentation and flow quantification
    Mariana Bustamante
    Sven Petersson
    Jonatan Eriksson
    Urban Alehagen
    Petter Dyverfeldt
    Carl-Johan Carlhäll
    Tino Ebbers
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
  • [8] Improved Semi-Automated 4D Flow MRI Analysis in the Aorta in Patients With Congenitally Altered and Tricuspid Aortic Valves
    Schnell, Susanne
    Entezari, Pegah
    Mahadewia, Riti I.
    Malaisrie, S. C.
    McCarthy, Patrick M.
    Collins, Jeremy
    Carr, James
    Markl, Michael
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [9] Volume flow measurements with a novel semi-automated 4D Doppler ultrasound scanner
    Forsberg, F
    Liu, JB
    Stein, A
    Deng, X
    Ackerman, W
    Herzog, D
    Abend, K
    Needleman, L
    [J]. 2004 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vols 1-3, 2004, : 2101 - 2104
  • [10] 4D flow MRI of the aorta becomes practical: performance and observer variability for a new semi-automated workflow for 3D visualization and quantification of aortic hemodynamics
    Susanne Schnell
    Pegah Entezari
    Riti J Mahadevia
    Daniel Rinewalt
    Jacob Fluckiger
    Jeremy Collins
    James Carr
    Bernd A Jung
    Michael Markl
    [J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)