Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Ralphsmith, Maisie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Dean, Joanne [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; AMERICAN UROGYNECOLOGIC SOCIETY; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; INSTRUMENTS PROCEEDINGS; RECTAL SURGEONS; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; REGISTRY; URODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. Methods We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2334
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric otolaryngology
    Powell, J.
    Powell, S.
    Robson, A.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01): : 2 - 7
  • [32] Patient-reported outcome measures in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Anusha Yoganathan
    Teresa Sandinha
    Mohith Shamdas
    Asterios Diafas
    David Steel
    Eye, 2023, 37 : 391 - 401
  • [33] Patient-reported outcome measures in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Yoganathan, Anusha
    Sandinha, Teresa
    Shamdas, Mohith
    Diafas, Asterios
    Steel, David
    EYE, 2023, 37 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [34] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Valerie Shilling
    Lucy Matthews
    Valerie Jenkins
    Lesley Fallowfield
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 1859 - 1876
  • [35] Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery: A systematic review
    Beighley, Adam
    Zhang, Allen
    Huang, Brendan
    Carr, Christopher
    Mathkour, Mansour
    Werner, Cassidy
    Scullen, Tyler
    Kilgore, Mitchell D.
    Maulucci, Christopher M.
    Dallapiazza, Robert F.
    Kalyvas, James
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2022, 13 (04): : 378 - 389
  • [36] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    N. Di Stefano
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017, 274 : 1807 - 1811
  • [37] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Systemic Mastocytosis: A Systematic Review
    Akin, Cem
    Sullivan, Erin
    Roche, Maria
    Scherber, Robyn
    Powell, Dakota
    Green, Teresa
    Siebenhaar, Frank
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 153 (02) : AB223 - AB223
  • [38] Patient-reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review
    Kumaran, Sheela E.
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Baker, Rod
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2018, 101 (04) : 460 - 484
  • [39] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Shilling, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 1859 - 1876
  • [40] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES FOR PAIN IN AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Natale, P.
    Hannan, E.
    Sautenet, B.
    Ju, A.
    Perrone, R.
    Burnette, E.
    Casteleijn, N.
    Chapman, A.
    Eastty, S.
    Gansevoort, R.
    Hogan, M.
    Horie, S.
    Knebelmann, B.
    Lee, R.
    Mustafa, R.
    Sandford, R.
    Baumgart, A.
    Tong, A.
    Strippoli, G.
    Craig, J.
    Rangan, G.
    Cho, Y.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 26 : 48 - 48