Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Ralphsmith, Maisie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Dean, Joanne [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; AMERICAN UROGYNECOLOGIC SOCIETY; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; INSTRUMENTS PROCEEDINGS; RECTAL SURGEONS; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; REGISTRY; URODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. Methods We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2334
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review
    de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares
    Driusso, Patricia
    de Godoy, Amanda Garcia
    de Sousa, Ana Paula
    Avila, Mariana Arias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [22] Patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and evaluation
    Keller, San
    Bocell, Fraser D.
    Mangrum, Rikki
    McLorg, Alizee
    Logan, Dilani
    Chen, Allen L.
    Steen, Andrew, I
    Woods, Phillip
    Weinberg, Jessica
    Royce, Leah
    Sansing-Foster, Veronica
    Tarver, Michelle E.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 135 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [23] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome measures for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a systematic review
    Katharina Piontek
    Theresa Donhauser
    Gesina Kann
    Marie Fechtner
    Christian Apfelbacher
    Michaela Gabes
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2137 - 2153
  • [25] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty
    Barone, M.
    Cogliandro, A.
    Di Stefano, N.
    Tambone, V.
    Persichetti, P.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (04) : 1807 - 1811
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a systematic review
    Piontek, Katharina
    Donhauser, Theresa
    Kann, Gesina
    Fechtner, Marie
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    Gabes, Michaela
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (08) : 2137 - 2153
  • [27] Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review
    Nobels-Janssen, Edith
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Boogaarts, Jeroen D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (23) : 1096 - 1112
  • [28] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric endocrinology
    Richard G. McGee
    Edward Y. B. Zhang
    Jennifer J. G. Tan
    Aiden C. K. Cheung
    Matthew P. Garvey
    BMC Endocrine Disorders, 22
  • [29] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric endocrinology
    McGee, Richard G.
    Zhang, Edward Y. B.
    Tan, Jennifer J. G.
    Cheung, Aiden C. K.
    Garvey, Matthew P.
    BMC ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Acceptability study of patient-reported outcome measures for the Australasian pelvic floor procedure registry
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Bavor, Claire
    Marsh, Lucy
    Dean, Joanne
    Daly, Oliver
    Vasiliadis, Dora
    Ahern, Susannah
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 : 116 - 116