Radiation characteristics and hypo-fractionation dose response for the DVS implantable MOSFET dosimeter

被引:1
|
作者
Beyer, G. P.
Pursley, J.
Mann, G.
Espenhahn, E.
Fraisse, C.
Godfrey, D.
Oldham, M.
机构
[1] Sicel Technologies Inc, Morrisville, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761596
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Evaluation of the radiation characteristics and performance of the DVS® implantable MOSFET dosimeter for typical and hypo‐fractionated protocols. Method and Materials: The commercially available DVS is calibrated for use in the range of 150–250 cGy per fraction up to 80 Gy. The dosimeter was evaluated to determine its radiation characteristics, including response to energy, angular dependence, temperature, and dose shadowing. Dosimeter performance was also validated in a phantom simulating different radiation treatment conditions. A high dose calibrated dosimeter for use with hypo‐fractionated protocols is introduced. Phantom measurements were performed to validate this dosimeter in the dose per fraction range of 400–1200 cGy. All phantom data was validated using a NIST‐traceable calibrated ion chamber. Results: The DVS was found to have a very small energy dependency (⩽1.5%) in the [formula omitted]‐18 MV range. With kV onboard imaging, an over‐response was only measurable for doses from kV‐CBCT. The radial angular dependence was found to be within 1.4% and the maximum angular dependence (6%) was obtained for beams traveling through the coil and electronics. A dosimeter implanted in close parallel alignment with the sagittal body axis would minimize this effect. Since the DVS is calibrated at 37°C (for use at body temperature), measurements performed at room temperature require a correction factor of approximately 1.033. Phantom measurements (23°C, 37°C) resulted in values well within the specified accuracy of 5%. The dosimeter calibrated for use in hypo‐fractionation applications resulted in an average variability of −0.3% (σ=2.2%) from predicted dose in the range of 400–1200cGy per fraction. Conclusions: This data suggests that DVS can be used, together with current delivery and planning techniques, to optimize radiation treatment by measuring the dose delivered in the treatment area. Testing shows the potential to use the high‐dose calibrated dosimeter with hypo‐fractionated radiation treatments. Research sponsored by Sicel Technologies, Inc. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2610 / 2610
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of time and dose fractionation on the response of Harwell Gammachrome YR PMMA dosimeter
    Farah, Khaled
    Hosni, Faouzi
    Mejri, Arbi
    Hamzaoui, Ahmed Hichem
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2014, 98 : 113 - 117
  • [22] MCz diode response as a high-dose gamma radiation dosimeter
    Camargo, F.
    Goncalves, J. A. C.
    Khoury, H. J.
    Napolitano, C. M.
    Harkonen, J.
    Bueno, C. C.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2008, 43 (2-6) : 1160 - 1162
  • [23] Disease control outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy or moderate hypo-fractionation for prostate cancer: Real-world experience at two Canadian centers
    Hu, Hsin-pei
    Anagnostopoulos, Gregory
    Gouran-Savadkoohi, Mohammad
    Dayes, Ian
    Ishkanian, Adrian
    Hallock, Abhirami
    Lukka, Himanshu
    Quan, Kimmen
    Schnarr, Kara
    Cuthbert, David
    Goldberg, Mira
    Chang, Yi Meng
    Tsakiridis, Theodoros
    PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (02): : 193 - 202
  • [24] Re-irradiation with Moderate Hypo-fractionation Using Intensity Modulated Photon or Proton Radiation Therapy in Locally Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Nasopharynx
    Nam, Heerim
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Yang, Kyungmi
    Oh, Dongryul
    Noh, Jae Myoung
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 54 (01): : 96 - 108
  • [25] TUMOR CONTROL-RADIATION RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP AND DOSE FRACTIONATION
    SUIT, H
    WETTE, R
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1965, 25 (01) : 246 - &
  • [26] Radiation-induced optic neuropathy: Dose response and modeling total dose and fractionation
    Bhandare, N.
    Song, W.
    Moiseenko, V.
    Malyapa, R.
    Morris, C. G.
    Mendenhall, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S396 - S396
  • [27] Implantable Drug Delivery System Response to Large Dose Radiation Treatment
    Demaree, C. J.
    Kirsner, S. M.
    Mason, B.
    Kosturakis, A.
    Ludwig, M. S.
    Gebhardt, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E471 - E471
  • [28] Performance characteristics and commissioning of MOSFET as an in-vivo dosimeter for high energy photon external beam radiation therapy
    Gopiraj, A.
    Billimagga, Ramesh S.
    Ramasubramanian, Velayudham
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2008, 13 (03) : 114 - 125
  • [29] Quantifying the Effects of Radiation Therapy Fractionation Scheme On Dose Response Modeling
    Wallat, E. M.
    Wuschner, A. E.
    Flakus, M. J.
    Shao, W.
    Reinhardt, J. M.
    Christensen, G. E.
    Bayouth, J. E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E653 - E653
  • [30] FIELD SIZE DEPENDENCE OF RADIATION SENSITIVITY AND DOSE FRACTIONATION RESPONSE IN SKIN
    SHYMKO, RM
    HAUSER, DL
    ARCHAMBEAU, JO
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (06): : 1143 - 1148