Outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors: A systematic review

被引:16
|
作者
Mehta, Anuj, V [1 ]
Wilson, Christopher [1 ]
King, Tonya S. [1 ]
Gallo, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
Tendon injury; Quadriceps tendon; Suture anchor; Transosseous tunnel; Tendon rupture; Tendon fixation; Quadriceps tendon repair;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Two major techniques are used to repair complete quadriceps tendon ruptures, transosseous tunnel (TT) and the suture anchor (SA). There are multiple studies comparing the biomechanical outcomes of repairs performed with TT or SA. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using SA and TT fixation techniques. Methods: Three major search engines were used with predetermined keyword searches to perform a systematic review of literature. These studies were independently scanned by two reviewers using PRISMA criterion. All included studies had to include at least one of the following outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, complications, and/or re-ruptures. Results: Using three major search engines, 1039 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for inclusion, 49 articles were reviewed. Two independent reviewers searched the studies to meet the inclusion criteria, and eight studies were selected. These eight studies included 156 knees in the If group and 54 knees in the SA group. The TT group had a significantly better ROM after QT repair (132.5 degrees versus 127.0 degrees, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the TT group (92.6) and SA group (91.0, p = 0.11). There were significantly more complications in SA groups (9.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.013), but not a significant difference in re-rupture rate between those undergoing SA vs. TT repair (3.7% versus 0%, p = 0.065). The SA group had a significantly higher age at time of surgery (63.62 vs. 54.32) Conclusion: The current study suggests that, following quadriceps tendon rupture, there are no significant differences in functional outcome between If and SA techniques. Those undergoing If repair attained a statistically significantly greater final ROM but this difference may not be clinically relevant. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of post-operative complications using SA technique. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 344
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors for the repair of acute quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies
    Dankert, John F.
    Mehta, Devan D.
    Remark, Lindsey H.
    Leucht, Philipp
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (04) : 821 - 828
  • [2] Repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors
    Richards, DP
    Barber, FA
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (05): : 556 - 559
  • [3] Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon after tendon repair - Suture anchors versus transosseous suture fixation
    Sano, Hirotaka
    Yamashita, Takeshi
    Wakabayashi, Ikuko
    Itoi, Eiji
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04): : 542 - 546
  • [4] Quadriceps tendon rupture. Anchor or transosseous suture? A systematic review
    Hochheim, M. Corydon
    Bartels, E. M.
    Iversen, J. Vestergard
    [J]. MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (03): : 356 - 362
  • [5] Prospective multicentre study of the clinical and functional outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair with suture anchors
    Mille F.
    Adam A.
    Aubry S.
    Leclerc G.
    Ghislandi X.
    Sergent P.
    Garbuio P.
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2016, 26 (1) : 85 - 92
  • [6] Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Quadriceps Tendon Repair Techniques
    Sherman, Seth L.
    Copeland, Marilyn E.
    Milles, Jeffrey L.
    Flood, David A.
    Pfeiffer, Ferris M.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1117 - 1124
  • [7] The Use of Suture Anchors to Repair the Ruptured Quadriceps Tendon
    Bushnell, Brandon D.
    Whitener, George B.
    Rubright, James H.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Logel, Kevin J.
    Wood, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (06) : 407 - 413
  • [8] The use of suture anchors to repair the ruptured quadriceps tendon
    Bushnell, Brandon D.
    Whitener, George B.
    Rubright, James H.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Logel, Kevin J.
    Wood, Mark L.
    [J]. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2008, 19 (03): : 314 - 320
  • [9] No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Sean B. Sequeira
    Lynette M. Sequeira
    Mark D. Wieland
    Casey M. Imbergamo
    Kenneth Tepper
    [J]. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10
  • [10] No difference in load to failure or stiffness between transosseous tunnels, suture anchors, and cortical buttons for pectoralis major tendon repair: a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Sequeira, Sean B.
    Sequeira, Lynette M.
    Wieland, Mark D.
    Imbergamo, Casey M.
    Tepper, Kenneth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 10 (01)