Outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors: A systematic review

被引:16
|
作者
Mehta, Anuj, V [1 ]
Wilson, Christopher [1 ]
King, Tonya S. [1 ]
Gallo, Robert A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Hershey Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Hershey, PA USA
关键词
Tendon injury; Quadriceps tendon; Suture anchor; Transosseous tunnel; Tendon rupture; Tendon fixation; Quadriceps tendon repair;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Two major techniques are used to repair complete quadriceps tendon ruptures, transosseous tunnel (TT) and the suture anchor (SA). There are multiple studies comparing the biomechanical outcomes of repairs performed with TT or SA. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using SA and TT fixation techniques. Methods: Three major search engines were used with predetermined keyword searches to perform a systematic review of literature. These studies were independently scanned by two reviewers using PRISMA criterion. All included studies had to include at least one of the following outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, complications, and/or re-ruptures. Results: Using three major search engines, 1039 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for inclusion, 49 articles were reviewed. Two independent reviewers searched the studies to meet the inclusion criteria, and eight studies were selected. These eight studies included 156 knees in the If group and 54 knees in the SA group. The TT group had a significantly better ROM after QT repair (132.5 degrees versus 127.0 degrees, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the TT group (92.6) and SA group (91.0, p = 0.11). There were significantly more complications in SA groups (9.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.013), but not a significant difference in re-rupture rate between those undergoing SA vs. TT repair (3.7% versus 0%, p = 0.065). The SA group had a significantly higher age at time of surgery (63.62 vs. 54.32) Conclusion: The current study suggests that, following quadriceps tendon rupture, there are no significant differences in functional outcome between If and SA techniques. Those undergoing If repair attained a statistically significantly greater final ROM but this difference may not be clinically relevant. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of post-operative complications using SA technique. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 344
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Fixation of the Gracilis Tendon via Transosseous Tunnels
    Zhang, Hangzhou
    Ye, Mao
    Liang, Qingwei
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [32] Outcomes and Complications Following Chronic Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review
    Hahn, Alexander K.
    Coladonato, Carlo
    Corvi, John J.
    Patel, Neel K.
    Sonnier, John Hayden
    Tjoumakaris, Fotios
    Freedman, Kevin B.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [33] Quadriceps tendon repair using double row suture anchor fixation: Case reports and review of the literature
    Zengui, Z. F.
    Adaoui, O. El
    Fargouch, M.
    Okouango, B. J. C.
    Andaloussi, Y. El
    Fadili, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2022, 92
  • [34] Quadriceps Tendon Repair Using Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation
    Tramer, Joseph S.
    Evans, Hardy
    Ziedas, Alexander C.
    Swantek, Alexander J.
    Jordan, Steven E.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2021, 10 (10): : E2337 - E2342
  • [35] Patellar Tendon Repair With Suture Anchors Using a Combined Suture Technique of a Krackow-Bunnell Weave
    Gaines, Robert J.
    Grabill, Scott E.
    DeMaio, Marlene
    Carr, Donald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (01) : 68 - 71
  • [36] Pain scores and functional outcomes of patients with shoulder labral repair using all-suture anchors versus conventional anchors
    David A. Freeman
    Kevin A. Hao
    Keegan M. Hones
    Bankole O. Olowofela
    Ryan Parrish
    Derek Damrow
    Joseph J. King
    Kevin W. Farmer
    Marissa Pazik
    Roach P. Roach
    [J]. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2024, 34 : 1509 - 1515
  • [37] Outcomes and Material Cost Comparison of Transosseous Versus Suture Anchor Fixation of the Achilles Tendon: A Retrospective Study
    Wolf, Joseph
    Fallat, Lawrence
    Coffey, Mary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 61 (01): : 12 - 16
  • [38] Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Transosseous Sutures Versus Suture Anchors: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Trial
    Ye, Mao
    Zhang, Hangzhou
    Liang, Qingwei
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (05)
  • [39] Biomechanical Comparison of Four- versus Six-Strand Transosseous Suture Repair for Patellar Tendon Rupture
    Zhang, Tina
    Wahl, Alexander
    Schneider, Matheus
    Xu, Dali
    Hahn, Alexander
    Meredith, Sean J.
    Packer, Jonathan D.
    Leong, Natalie L.
    Zhang, Li-Qun
    Henn, R. Frank
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (03) : 193 - 197
  • [40] Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tan, T. K.
    Subramaniam, A. G.
    Radic, R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 243 - 243