Morbidity of salvage radical prostatectomy: limited impact of the minimally invasive approach

被引:4
|
作者
Perera, Marlon [1 ]
Vilaseca, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
Tin, Amy L. [3 ]
Nguyen, Daniel P. [1 ,4 ]
Corradi, Renato B. [1 ]
Touijer, Adam S. [1 ]
Martin-Malburet, Alexandre Godefroy [1 ,4 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Benfante, Nicole [3 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [3 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Touijer, Karim A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Urol Dept, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Salvage therapy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Postoperative complications; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; RADIATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04031-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to report the morbidity profile of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) after radiotherapy failure and assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative complications and functional outcomes. Materials and methods Between 1985 and 2019, a total of 293 patients underwent SRP; 232 underwent open SRP; and 61 underwent laparoscopic SRP with or without robotic assistance. Complications were recorded and classified into standardized categories per the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results Twenty-nine patients (10%) experienced grade 3 complications within 30 days, 22 (9.5%) after open and 7 (11%) after MIS (p = 0.6). Between 30 and 90 days after surgery, 7.3% of patients in the open group and 10% in the MIS group had grade 3 complications (p = 0.5). The most common complication was bladder neck contracture (BNC), representing 40% of the 30-90 day complications. Within one year of SRP, 81 patients (31%, 95% CI 25%, 37%) developed BNC; we saw non-significant lower rates in MIS (25 vs 32%; p = 0.4). Functional outcomes were poor after SRP and showed no difference between open and MIS groups for urinary continence (16 vs 18%, p = 0.7) and erectile function (7 vs 13%, p = 0.4). 5 year cancer-specific survival and overall survival was 95% and 88% for the entire cohort, respectively. Conclusions Our outcomes suggest poor functional recovery after SRP, regardless of the operative approach. Currently there is no evidence favoring the use of open or MIS approach. Further studies are required to ensure comparable outcomes between these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach to Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients with Malnutrition
    Adams-Mardi, Cyrus
    Sparks, Andrew
    Whalen, Michael
    NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 75 (06): : 1448 - 1453
  • [43] Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy may decrease morbidity
    不详
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2001, 15 (01): : 83 - 83
  • [44] Minimally Invasive Hernia Repair in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Kaler, Kamaljot
    Vernez, Simone L.
    Dolich, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (10) : 1036 - 1040
  • [45] Factors Associated with the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy in the United States
    Ulmer, William D.
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Dodgion, Christopher
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (03): : 775 - 780
  • [46] Re: Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Koupparis, Anthony J.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 1118 - 1119
  • [47] COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERINEAL VERSUS RETROPUBIC AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Prasad, Sandip
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lavelle, Rebecca
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    Hu, Jim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E33 - E34
  • [48] Re: Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    White, Ralph de Vere
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (02) : 355 - 356
  • [49] DIFFUSION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE PUBLIC CONSEQUENCE OF AN UNTESTED TREATMENT
    Anderson, Christopher
    Atoria, Coral
    Elkin, Elena
    Eastham, James
    Touijer, Karim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E388 - E388
  • [50] Comparative Effectiveness of Perineal Versus Retropubic and Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lavelle, Rebecca
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (01): : 111 - 115