Morbidity of salvage radical prostatectomy: limited impact of the minimally invasive approach

被引:4
|
作者
Perera, Marlon [1 ]
Vilaseca, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
Tin, Amy L. [3 ]
Nguyen, Daniel P. [1 ,4 ]
Corradi, Renato B. [1 ]
Touijer, Adam S. [1 ]
Martin-Malburet, Alexandre Godefroy [1 ,4 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Benfante, Nicole [3 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [3 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Touijer, Karim A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Urol Dept, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Salvage therapy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Postoperative complications; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; RADIATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04031-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to report the morbidity profile of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) after radiotherapy failure and assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative complications and functional outcomes. Materials and methods Between 1985 and 2019, a total of 293 patients underwent SRP; 232 underwent open SRP; and 61 underwent laparoscopic SRP with or without robotic assistance. Complications were recorded and classified into standardized categories per the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results Twenty-nine patients (10%) experienced grade 3 complications within 30 days, 22 (9.5%) after open and 7 (11%) after MIS (p = 0.6). Between 30 and 90 days after surgery, 7.3% of patients in the open group and 10% in the MIS group had grade 3 complications (p = 0.5). The most common complication was bladder neck contracture (BNC), representing 40% of the 30-90 day complications. Within one year of SRP, 81 patients (31%, 95% CI 25%, 37%) developed BNC; we saw non-significant lower rates in MIS (25 vs 32%; p = 0.4). Functional outcomes were poor after SRP and showed no difference between open and MIS groups for urinary continence (16 vs 18%, p = 0.7) and erectile function (7 vs 13%, p = 0.4). 5 year cancer-specific survival and overall survival was 95% and 88% for the entire cohort, respectively. Conclusions Our outcomes suggest poor functional recovery after SRP, regardless of the operative approach. Currently there is no evidence favoring the use of open or MIS approach. Further studies are required to ensure comparable outcomes between these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF HAEMATOMATA AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kirby, Roger
    Challacombe, Ben
    Patil, Krishna
    Amoroso, Peter
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Fitzpatrick, John M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [32] Contemporary Management of Hemorrhage After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Dean, Lucas W.
    Tin, Amy L.
    Chesnut, Gregory T.
    Assel, Melissa
    LaDuke, Emily
    Fromkin, Jillian
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James A.
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 130 : 120 - 125
  • [33] Robotic radical prostatectomy: A minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer
    Tewari A.
    Kaul S.
    Menon M.
    Current Urology Reports, 2005, 6 (1) : 45 - 48
  • [34] Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Perception vs. Reality
    Nirmal, T. J.
    Kekre, N. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 26 (02) : 318 - +
  • [35] The effect of minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy surgeon volume
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (05) : 569 - 576
  • [36] OUTCOMES OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN VERY OBESE MEN USING AN EXTRAPERITONEAL MINIMALLY-INVASIVE APPROACH
    Sundi, Debasish
    Reese, Adam C.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Mettee, Lynda Z.
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E209 - E209
  • [37] Minimally invasive limited pericardiectomy: The hybrid approach
    Ohtsuka, T
    Takamoto, S
    Nakajima, J
    Miyairi, T
    Kotsuka, Y
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 70 (04): : 1429 - 1430
  • [38] IMPACT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY ON CONTEMPORARY OPEN PROSTATECTOMY
    Motamedinia, Piruz
    Fast, Angela
    Benson, Mitchell
    McKiernan, James
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E460 - E460
  • [39] Morbidity and costs of salvage vs. primary radical prostatectomy in older men
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (08) : 1477 - 1482
  • [40] Radical prostatectomy: Morbidity of the robotic versus the laparoscopic approach
    Rozet, Francois
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Vallancien, Guy
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A218 - A218