Morbidity of salvage radical prostatectomy: limited impact of the minimally invasive approach

被引:4
|
作者
Perera, Marlon [1 ]
Vilaseca, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
Tin, Amy L. [3 ]
Nguyen, Daniel P. [1 ,4 ]
Corradi, Renato B. [1 ]
Touijer, Adam S. [1 ]
Martin-Malburet, Alexandre Godefroy [1 ,4 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Benfante, Nicole [3 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [3 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Touijer, Karim A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Reseau Hosp Neuchatelois, Urol Dept, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Salvage therapy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Postoperative complications; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; RADIATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04031-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose We aimed to report the morbidity profile of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) after radiotherapy failure and assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative complications and functional outcomes. Materials and methods Between 1985 and 2019, a total of 293 patients underwent SRP; 232 underwent open SRP; and 61 underwent laparoscopic SRP with or without robotic assistance. Complications were recorded and classified into standardized categories per the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results Twenty-nine patients (10%) experienced grade 3 complications within 30 days, 22 (9.5%) after open and 7 (11%) after MIS (p = 0.6). Between 30 and 90 days after surgery, 7.3% of patients in the open group and 10% in the MIS group had grade 3 complications (p = 0.5). The most common complication was bladder neck contracture (BNC), representing 40% of the 30-90 day complications. Within one year of SRP, 81 patients (31%, 95% CI 25%, 37%) developed BNC; we saw non-significant lower rates in MIS (25 vs 32%; p = 0.4). Functional outcomes were poor after SRP and showed no difference between open and MIS groups for urinary continence (16 vs 18%, p = 0.7) and erectile function (7 vs 13%, p = 0.4). 5 year cancer-specific survival and overall survival was 95% and 88% for the entire cohort, respectively. Conclusions Our outcomes suggest poor functional recovery after SRP, regardless of the operative approach. Currently there is no evidence favoring the use of open or MIS approach. Further studies are required to ensure comparable outcomes between these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1644
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Morbidity of salvage radical prostatectomy: limited impact of the minimally invasive approach
    Marlon Perera
    Antoni Vilaseca
    Amy L. Tin
    Daniel P. Nguyen
    Renato B. Corradi
    Adam S. Touijer
    Alexandre Godefroy Martin-Malburet
    Ricardo Alvim
    Nicole Benfante
    Daniel D. Sjoberg
    Vincent Laudone
    Peter T. Scardino
    James A. Eastham
    Karim A. Touijer
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 1637 - 1644
  • [2] IMPACT OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH ON MORBIDITY OF SALVAGE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Perera, Marlon
    Vilaseca, Antoni
    Tin, Amy
    Nguyen, Daniel
    Carradi, Renato
    Touijer, Adam
    Benfante, Nicole
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Laudone, Vincent
    Scardino, Peter
    Eastham, James
    Touijer, Karim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E983 - E983
  • [3] Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Humphreys, MR
    Gettman, MT
    Chow, GK
    Zincke, H
    Blute, ML
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 79 (09) : 1169 - 1180
  • [4] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TREATMENT FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY
    Simone, Crivellaro
    Lorenzo, Tosco
    Anna, Palazzetti
    Bruno, Frea
    Ervin, Kocjancic
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 : 74 - 75
  • [5] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Prasad, Michaella M.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 4 - 5
  • [6] SURGEON ADOPTION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Anderson, Christopher
    Atoria, Coral
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James
    Elkin, Elena
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E16 - E16
  • [7] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (14) : 2278 - 2284
  • [8] Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Lowrance, William T.
    Elkin, Elena B.
    Eastham, James A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (07): : 619 - 620
  • [9] Does transperitoneal minimally invasive radical prostatectomy increase the amount of small bowel receiving salvage radiation?
    Luz, Murilo A.
    Dal Pra, Alan
    Tu, Hin-Yu Vincent
    Duclos, Marie
    Cury, Fabio L. B.
    Bachir, Bassel G.
    Aprikian, Armen G.
    Tanguay, Simon
    Kassouf, Wassim
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 7 (11-12): : 444 - 448
  • [10] Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: Morbidity revisited
    Vaidya, A
    Soloway, MS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (06): : 1998 - 2001