Conditioning Multiple-Point Statistics Simulation to Inequality Data

被引:13
|
作者
Straubhaar, Julien [1 ]
Renard, Philippe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Neuchatel, Ctr Hydrogeol & Geotherm CHYN, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, Oslo, Norway
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
digital elevation model; direct sampling; geostatistics; inequality constraints; multiple-point statistics; simulation;
D O I
10.1029/2020EA001515
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Stochastic modeling is often employed in environmental sciences for the analysis and understanding of complex systems. For example, random fields are key components in uncertainty analysis or Bayesian inverse modeling. Multiple-point statistics (MPS) provides efficient simulation tools for simulating fields reproducing the spatial statistics depicted in a training image (TI), while accounting for local or block conditioning data. Among MPS methods, the direct sampling algorithm is a flexible pixel-based technique that consists in first assigning the conditioning data values (so-called hard data) in the simulation grid, and then in populating the rest of the simulation domain in a random order by successively pasting a value from a TI cell sharing a similar pattern. In this study, an extension of the direct sampling method is proposed to account for inequality data, that is, constraints in given cells consisting of lower and/or upper bounds for the simulated values. Indeed, inequality data are often available in practice. The new approach involves the adaptation of the distance used to compare and evaluate the match between two patterns to account for such constraints. The proposed method, implemented in the DeeSse code, allows generating random fields both reflecting the spatial statistics of the TI and honoring the inequality constraints. Finally examples of topography simulations illustrate and show the capabilities of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiple-point statistics for training image selection
    Boisvert J.B.
    Pyrcz M.J.
    Deutsch C.V.
    Natural Resources Research, 2007, 16 (4) : 313 - 321
  • [32] Multiple-point geostatistical simulation for mine evaluation with aeromagnetic data
    Hong, Jinpyo
    Oh, Seokhoon
    Cho, Seong-Jun
    EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 49 (06) : 952 - 965
  • [33] Simulation of braided river elevation model time series with multiple-point statistics
    Pirot, Guillaume
    Straubhaar, Julien
    Renard, Philippe
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 214 : 148 - 156
  • [34] A new methodology to train fracture network simulation using multiple-point statistics
    Bruna, Pierre-Olivier
    Straubhaar, Julien
    Prabhakaran, Rahul
    Bertotti, Giovanni
    Bisdom, Kevin
    Mariethoz, Gregoire
    Meda, Marco
    SOLID EARTH, 2019, 10 (02) : 537 - 559
  • [35] Blocking Moving Window algorithm: Conditioning multiple-point simulations to hydrogeological data
    Alcolea, Andres
    Renard, Philippe
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [36] Hierarchical multiple-point simulation of multiple facies
    Maharaja, A
    GIS and Spatial Analysis, Vol 1and 2, 2005, : 737 - 742
  • [37] A workflow for multiple-point geostatistical simulation
    Liu, YH
    Harding, A
    Gilbert, R
    Journel, A
    Geostatistics Banff 2004, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, 14 : 245 - 254
  • [38] Generative Adversarial Networks to incorporate the Training Image uncertainty in multiple-point statistics simulation
    Scholze, Gustavo Pretto
    Bassani, Marcel Antonio Arcari
    Costa, Joao Felipe Coimbra Leite
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 230
  • [39] Digital Elevation Data Fusion Using Multiple-Point Geostatistical Simulation
    Tang, Yunwei
    Zhang, Jingxiong
    Jing, Linhai
    Li, Hui
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 8 (10) : 4922 - 4934
  • [40] Conditional multiple-point geostatistical simulation for unevenly distributed sample data
    Chen, Qiyu
    Liu, Gang
    Ma, Xiaogang
    Zhang, Junqiang
    Zhang, Xialin
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2019, 33 (4-6) : 973 - 987