Design and Validation of a Questionnaire about Learning Perception through Peer Feedback in Higher Education

被引:7
|
作者
Sanchez-Marti, Angelina [1 ]
Munoz Moreno, Jose Luis [2 ]
Ion, Georgeta [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Pedag Sistemat & Social, Placa Coneixement,Edificio G6,Despacho 173, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Pedag Aplicada, Placa Coneixement,Edificio G6,Despacho 267, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Pedag Aplicada, Placa Coneixement,Edificio G6,Despacho 248, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
assessment; peer feedback; higher education; evaluation tool; validation; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS; ENGAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.21865/RIDEP53.4.09
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although peer feedback is a strategy usually linked to assessment, with a great impact on the student's learning and competence development, there are still few experiences in which it is linked to learning, and few contributions are set to analyse its effects. Therefore, this paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to analyse the effects of giving peer feedback on the learning process of university students of Education Sciences. Consistent with the theory of the social construction of knowledge, it is initially structured around four dimensions: cognitive and metacognitive development, social competencies, professional competences, and socio-affective and intrapersonal aspects. The questionnaire was self-administered to a sample of 425 first-year students of the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona. The results of the analysis lead us to propose a final questionnaire of 20 items and three latent variables with adequate reliability and validity indexes.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 128
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of a questionnaire about the perception of occupational biohazard in Spanish companies
    Aguilar-Elena, Raul
    Campo-Barrio, Alberto
    Morchon, Rodrigo
    Martinez-Merino, Victor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2016, 22 (04) : 541 - 549
  • [32] STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF FEEDBACK USING PEER REVIEW AS A PEDAGOGICAL METHOD TO INCREASE ACADEMIC WRITING SKILLS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Josefsson, Pernilla
    Green, Anders
    Normark, Maria
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 513 - 519
  • [33] The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education
    van der Pol, J.
    van den Berg, B. A. M.
    Admiraal, W. F.
    Simons, P. R. J.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2008, 51 (04) : 1804 - 1817
  • [34] Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
    Nicol, David
    Thomson, Avril
    Breslin, Caroline
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (01) : 102 - 122
  • [35] Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other
    Rowland, ML
    [J]. ADULT EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2002, 53 (01) : 65 - 66
  • [36] Peer learning: A learning experience for the knowledge construction in higher education
    Roig Zamora, Jose
    Araya Ramirez, Jessica
    [J]. REVISTA COMUNICACION, 2014, 23 (01): : 54 - 64
  • [37] NEW TRENDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN AND VALIDATION TO KNOW BASIC SKILLS TO USE ICT
    Perez Barea, Jose Javier
    Garcia Jurado, Alejandro
    [J]. 13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 7013 - 7017
  • [38] Peer Feedback on Collaborative Learning Activities in Veterinary Education
    Dooley, Laura M.
    Bamford, Nicholas J.
    [J]. VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (04)
  • [39] Design of a Student Satisfaction Questionnaire for a Higher Education Course Implementing the Flipped Learning Model
    Landa Cavazos, Maria Raquel
    Ramirez Sanchez, Miguel Ysrrael
    [J]. PAGINAS DE EDUCACION, 2018, 11 (02): : 153 - 175
  • [40] Designing student peer assessment in higher education: analysis of written and oral peer feedback
    van den Berg, I
    Admiraal, W
    Pilot, A
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 11 (02) : 135 - 147