The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Li, Junsheng [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Wu, Lisheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Hernia & Bariatr Surg, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
eTEP; IPOM; ventral hernia; incisional hernia; repair;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open sublay technique and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique are the most common used procedures in ventral and incisional hernia repair, however, each technique has its own disadvantages. The enhanced view total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) aims to put the mesh in the retromuscular space by minimal invasive technique. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of eTEP and IPOM approach in ventral and incisional hernia repair. Methods: The major databases (PubMed, Embase, Springer, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and all studies published through May 1, 2021, using the keywords "enhanced view extraperitoneal," "extended view totally extraperitoneal," "eTEP," "TEP," "laparoscopic retromuscular," "ventral hernia," "incisional hernia," "laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh," "IPOM." All relevant articles and reference lists in these original studies were also obtained from the above databases. Results: Five trials containing 433 patients were included in the present study. Compared with the IPOM technique, the eTEP ventral/incisional hernia repair was associated a longer operative time [mean difference=44.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.57, 63; P=0.00001], less acute pain on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference=-3.90; 95% CI: -4.42, -3.38; P<0.00001), and day 7 (standardized mean difference=-3.72; 95% CI: -6.09, 1.35; P=0.002), and the eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay compared with the IPOM group (mean difference=-0.56; 95% CI: -0.74, -0.39; P=0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning the incidence of seroma, hematoma, intraoperative complication, and postoperative ileus between eTEP and IPOM groups. Conclusions: The eTEP technique in ventral and incisional hernia repair shows significantly lower acute postoperative pain and shorter hospital study but a longer operative time. In addition, there is no significant difference in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Further randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the eTEP technique.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comment to: The impact of smoking on ventral and inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Gang
    Liu, Zhichun
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (05) : 2035 - 2036
  • [32] Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Julie L. Holihan
    Duyen H. Nguyen
    Mylan T. Nguyen
    Jiandi Mo
    Lillian S. Kao
    Mike K. Liang
    World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 89 - 99
  • [33] Mesh Location in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Holihan, Julie L.
    Nguyen, Duyen H.
    Nguyen, Mylan T.
    Mo, Jiandi
    Kao, Lillian S.
    Liang, Mike K.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [34] Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Darehzereshki, Ali
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Moazzez, Ashkan
    Lipham, John C.
    Mason, Rodney J.
    Katkhouda, Namir
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [35] PREOPERATIVE WEIGHT OPTIMIZATION BEFORE VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Marcolin, Patricia
    Araujo, Sergio
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
    Constante, Marcella
    Melo, Vitor
    Mao, Rui-Min D.
    DeJesus, Jana E.
    Lu, Richard
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1464 - S1464
  • [36] Mesh Type With Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Siddiqui, Ali
    Lyons, Nicole B.
    Anwoju, Oluwatunmininu
    Cohen, Brianna L.
    Ramsey, Walter A.
    O'Neil, Christopher F.
    Ali, Zuhair
    Liang, Mike K.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 291 : 603 - 610
  • [37] Biologic Versus Nonbiologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ali Darehzereshki
    Melanie Goldfarb
    Joerg Zehetner
    Ashkan Moazzez
    John C. Lipham
    Rodney J. Mason
    Namir Katkhouda
    World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 40 - 50
  • [38] Discussion: Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
    Mericli, Alexander F.
    Butler, Charles E.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (04) : 1068 - 1069
  • [39] Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    M. P. Morris
    J. A. Mellia
    A. N. Christopher
    M. N. Basta
    V. Patel
    K. Qiu
    R. B. Broach
    J. P. Fischer
    Hernia, 2021, 25 : 1035 - 1050
  • [40] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Penafiel, J. A. R.
    Valladares, G.
    Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca
    Avelino, P.
    Amorim, L.
    Teixeira, L.
    Brandao, G.
    Rosa, F.
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (02) : 321 - 332