The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Li, Junsheng [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Wu, Lisheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Hernia & Bariatr Surg, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
eTEP; IPOM; ventral hernia; incisional hernia; repair;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open sublay technique and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique are the most common used procedures in ventral and incisional hernia repair, however, each technique has its own disadvantages. The enhanced view total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) aims to put the mesh in the retromuscular space by minimal invasive technique. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of eTEP and IPOM approach in ventral and incisional hernia repair. Methods: The major databases (PubMed, Embase, Springer, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and all studies published through May 1, 2021, using the keywords "enhanced view extraperitoneal," "extended view totally extraperitoneal," "eTEP," "TEP," "laparoscopic retromuscular," "ventral hernia," "incisional hernia," "laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh," "IPOM." All relevant articles and reference lists in these original studies were also obtained from the above databases. Results: Five trials containing 433 patients were included in the present study. Compared with the IPOM technique, the eTEP ventral/incisional hernia repair was associated a longer operative time [mean difference=44.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.57, 63; P=0.00001], less acute pain on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference=-3.90; 95% CI: -4.42, -3.38; P<0.00001), and day 7 (standardized mean difference=-3.72; 95% CI: -6.09, 1.35; P=0.002), and the eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay compared with the IPOM group (mean difference=-0.56; 95% CI: -0.74, -0.39; P=0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning the incidence of seroma, hematoma, intraoperative complication, and postoperative ileus between eTEP and IPOM groups. Conclusions: The eTEP technique in ventral and incisional hernia repair shows significantly lower acute postoperative pain and shorter hospital study but a longer operative time. In addition, there is no significant difference in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Further randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the eTEP technique.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Márcia Regina Martins
    Hugo Santos-Sousa
    Miguel Alves do Vale
    Raquel Bouça-Machado
    Elisabete Barbosa
    Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 409
  • [22] Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martins, Marcia Regina
    Santos-Sousa, Hugo
    do Vale, Miguel Alves
    Bouca-Machado, Raquel
    Barbosa, Elisabete
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)
  • [23] Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhou, H.
    Shen, Y.
    Zhang, Z.
    Liu, X.
    Zhang, J.
    Chen, J.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (06) : 1561 - 1571
  • [24] Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    H. Zhou
    Y. Shen
    Z. Zhang
    X. Liu
    J. Zhang
    J. Chen
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 1561 - 1571
  • [25] Impact of the Drain Placement Following Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sanha, Valberto
    Trindade, Bruna Oliveira
    Rodriguez Elvir, Francisco A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S189 - S189
  • [26] Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    R. Dixit
    O. P. Prajapati
    A. Krishna
    S. K. Rai
    M. Prasad
    V. K. Bansal
    Hernia, 2023, 27 : 245 - 257
  • [27] Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dixit, R.
    Prajapati, O. P.
    Krishna, A.
    Rai, S. K.
    Prasad, M.
    Bansal, V. K.
    HERNIA, 2023, 27 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [28] Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tim Mathes
    Maren Walgenbach
    Robert Siegel
    World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 : 826 - 835
  • [29] Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mathes, Tim
    Walgenbach, Maren
    Siegel, Robert
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (04) : 826 - 835
  • [30] Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morris, M. P.
    Mellia, J. A.
    Christopher, A. N.
    Basta, M. N.
    Patel, V
    Qiu, K.
    Broach, R. B.
    Fischer, J. P.
    HERNIA, 2021, 25 (04) : 1035 - 1050