The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:23
|
作者
Li, Junsheng [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Wu, Lisheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Affiliated Zhongda Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp USTC 1, Dept Hernia & Bariatr Surg, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
eTEP; IPOM; ventral hernia; incisional hernia; repair;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Open sublay technique and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) technique are the most common used procedures in ventral and incisional hernia repair, however, each technique has its own disadvantages. The enhanced view total extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) aims to put the mesh in the retromuscular space by minimal invasive technique. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of eTEP and IPOM approach in ventral and incisional hernia repair. Methods: The major databases (PubMed, Embase, Springer, and Cochrane Library) were searched, and all studies published through May 1, 2021, using the keywords "enhanced view extraperitoneal," "extended view totally extraperitoneal," "eTEP," "TEP," "laparoscopic retromuscular," "ventral hernia," "incisional hernia," "laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh," "IPOM." All relevant articles and reference lists in these original studies were also obtained from the above databases. Results: Five trials containing 433 patients were included in the present study. Compared with the IPOM technique, the eTEP ventral/incisional hernia repair was associated a longer operative time [mean difference=44.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.57, 63; P=0.00001], less acute pain on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference=-3.90; 95% CI: -4.42, -3.38; P<0.00001), and day 7 (standardized mean difference=-3.72; 95% CI: -6.09, 1.35; P=0.002), and the eTEP group had a shorter hospital stay compared with the IPOM group (mean difference=-0.56; 95% CI: -0.74, -0.39; P=0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning the incidence of seroma, hematoma, intraoperative complication, and postoperative ileus between eTEP and IPOM groups. Conclusions: The eTEP technique in ventral and incisional hernia repair shows significantly lower acute postoperative pain and shorter hospital study but a longer operative time. In addition, there is no significant difference in terms of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Further randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the eTEP technique.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with fascial repair (IPOM-plus) for ventral and incisional hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, X.
    Shao, X.
    Cheng, T.
    Li, J.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2024, 28 (02) : 385 - 400
  • [2] Comparison of Different Weight Meshes in Ventral/Incisional Hernia Repair, the Outcomes of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Li, Junsheng
    Shao, Xiangyu
    Cheng, Tao
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (04): : 402 - 410
  • [3] Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yanyan
    Zhou, Haiyang
    Chai, Yunsheng
    Cao, Can
    Jin, Kaizhou
    Hu, Zhiqian
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (09) : 2233 - 2240
  • [4] Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yanyan Zhang
    Haiyang Zhou
    Yunsheng Chai
    Can Cao
    Kaizhou Jin
    Zhiqian Hu
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 2233 - 2240
  • [5] Systematic review of robotic ventral hernia repair with meta-analysis
    Tran, Elisa
    Sun, Jing
    Gundara, Justin
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 37 - 46
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    Bokhari, Syed A.
    Mallick, Ali S.
    Cheek, Elizabeth
    Baig, Mirza K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (01): : 64 - 72
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis
    Lopez-Cano, Manuel
    Armengol-Carrasco, Manuel
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (03): : 463 - 463
  • [8] Drain placement in retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marcolin, P.
    de Figueiredo, S. M. P.
    Constante, M. M.
    de Melo, V. M. F.
    de Araujo, S. W.
    Mao, R. -M. D.
    Lu, Richard
    [J]. HERNIA, 2023, 27 (03) : 519 - 526
  • [9] Impact of sex on ventral hernia repair outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oliveira, Eduarda Saba C.
    Calvi, Izabela P.
    Hora, David A. B.
    Gomes, Cintia P.
    Burla, Marina M.
    Mao, Rui-Min Diana
    Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli de
    Lu, Richard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 226 (03): : 385 - 392
  • [10] Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Carlo Alberto Schena
    David Moszkowicz
    Cyril Kuperas
    Régis Fara
    Sébastien Gaujoux
    Jean-François Gillion
    Caroline Gronnier
    Jérôme Loriau
    Muriel Mathonnet
    Olivier Oberlin
    Manuela Perez
    Yohann Renard
    Benoît Romain
    Guillaume Passot
    Patrick Pessaux
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 24 - 46