Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Ling, Zhenhao [2 ]
Deng, Xuejiao [1 ]
Deng, Tao [1 ]
Lyu, Xiaopu [3 ]
Li, Tingyuan [4 ]
Gao, Xiaorong [5 ]
Chen, Xi [6 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Meteorol Bur, Ecol Meteorol Ctr, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Meteorol Observ, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WRF; Community Multiscale Air Quality model; source contribution; unfavorable weather system; fine particulate matter; PEARL RIVER DELTA; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; HONG-KONG; OZONE FORMATION; SOUTHERN CHINA; HAZE EVENTS; VISIBILITY; AEROSOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Historical haze episodes (2013-16) in Guangzhou were examined and classified according to synoptic weather systems. Four types of weather systems were found to be unfavorable, among which "foreside of a cold front" (FC) and "sea high pressure" (SP) were the most frequent (> 75% of the total). Targeted case studies were conducted based on an FC-affected event and an SP-affected event with the aim of understanding the characteristics of the contributions of source regions to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Guangzhou. Four kinds of contributions-namely, emissions outside Guangdong Province (super-region), emissions from the Pearl River Delta region (PRD region), emissions from Guangzhou-Foshan-Shenzhen (GFS region), and emissions from Guangzhou (local)-were investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality model. The results showed that the source region contribution differed with different weather systems. SP was a stagnant weather condition, and the source region contribution ratio showed that the local region was a major contributor (37%), while the PRD region, GFS region and the super-region only contributed 8%, 2.8% and 7%, respectively, to PM2.5 concentrations. By contrast, FC favored regional transport. The super-region became noticeable, contributing 34.8%, while the local region decreased to 12%. A simple method was proposed to quantify the relative impact of meteorology and emissions. Meteorology had a 35% impact, compared with an impact of -18% for emissions, when comparing the FC-affected event with that of the SP. The results from this study can provide guidance to policymakers for the implementation of effective control strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1159
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Temporal characteristic and source analysis of PM2.5 in the most polluted city agglomeration of China
    Wu, Xiaoguo
    Ding, Yueyue
    Zhou, Shoubiao
    Tan, Ye
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (06) : 1221 - 1230
  • [32] Source profiles and contributions of biofuel combustion for PM2.5, PM10 and their compositions, in a city influenced by biofuel stoves
    Tian, Ying-Ze
    Chen, Jia-Bao
    Zhang, Lin-Lin
    Du, Xin
    Wei, Jin-Jin
    Fan, Hui
    Xu, Jiao
    Wang, Hai-Ting
    Guan, Liao
    Shi, Guo-Liang
    Feng, Yin-Chang
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 189 : 255 - 264
  • [33] Characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Jiaxing, China
    Zhao, Zhipeng
    Lv, Sheng
    Zhang, Yihua
    Zhao, Qianbiao
    Shen, Lin
    Xu, Shi
    Yu, Jianqiang
    Hou, Jingwen
    Jin, Chengyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (08) : 7497 - 7511
  • [34] Gated Recurrent Unit Coupled with Projection to Model Plane Imputation for the PM2.5 Prediction for Guangzhou City, China
    Saif-ul-Allah, Muhammad Waqas
    Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
    Ul-Haq, Noaman
    Salman, Chaudhary Awais
    Ahmed, Faisal
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Source apportionment of PM2.5 and visibility in Jinan,China
    Mengtian Cheng
    Guiqian Tang
    Bo Lv
    Xingru Li
    Xinrui Wu
    Yiming Wang
    Yuesi Wang
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2021, (04) : 207 - 215
  • [36] Source apportionment of PM2.5 and visibility in Jinan, China
    Cheng, Mengtian
    Tang, Guiqian
    Lv, Bo
    Li, Xingru
    Wu, Xinrui
    Wang, Yiming
    Wang, Yuesi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 102 : 207 - 215
  • [37] Characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Jiaxing, China
    Zhipeng Zhao
    Sheng Lv
    Yihua Zhang
    Qianbiao Zhao
    Lin Shen
    Shi Xu
    Jianqiang Yu
    Jingwen Hou
    Chengyu Jin
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 7497 - 7511
  • [38] Using a new WALSPMF model to quantify the source contributions to PM2.5 at a harbour site in China
    Shi, Guo-Liang
    Xu, Jiao
    Peng, Xing
    Tian, Ying-Ze
    Wang, Wei
    Han, Bo
    Zhang, Yu-Fen
    Feng, Yin-Chang
    Russell, Armistead G.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 126 : 66 - 75
  • [39] Contributions of City-Specific Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) to Differential In Vitro Oxidative Stress and Toxicity Implications between Beijing and Guangzhou of China
    Jin, Ling
    Xie, Jiawen
    Wong, Chris K. C.
    Chan, Serena K. Y.
    Abbaszade, Guelcin
    Schnelle-Kreis, Juergen
    Zimmermann, Ralf
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Gan
    Fu, Pingqing
    Li, Xiangdong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (05) : 2881 - 2891
  • [40] Impact of air pollution control policies on future PM2.5 concentrations and their source contributions in China
    Cai, Siyi
    Ma, Qiao
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Zhao, Bin
    Brauer, Michael
    Cohen, Aaron
    Martin, Randall V.
    Zhang, Qianqian
    Li, Qinbin
    Wang, Yuxuan
    Hao, Jiming
    Frostad, Joseph
    Forouzanfar, Mohammad H.
    Burnett, Richard T.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 227 : 124 - 133