A randomized prospective study of cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections

被引:18
|
作者
Garbino, J.
Villiger, P.
Caviezel, A.
Matulionyte, R.
Uckay, I.
Morel, P.
Lew, D.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Infect Dis, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Visceral Surg, Dept Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s15010-007-6237-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Presumptive antimicrobial therapy is an important aspect of the management of intra-abdominal infections. Together with surgery, antimicrobial combinations are still widely used to achieve the required spectrum of activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of parenteral cefepime + metronidazole vs imipenemcilastatin for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections in adult patients. Methods: Patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection were randomized to one of two treatment regimens: cefepime 2 g iv/12 h plus metronidazole 500 mg/8 h or imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg iv/6 h. The primary measure of clinical response was the decline of pre-treatment signs and symptoms of infection. The duration of follow-up was 30 days. Treatment failure was defined as either a lack of improvement or a worsening of pre-treatment signs and symptoms of infection. Surgical management of the infection was determined by the surgeon-in-charge. Results: Of the 122 intended-to-treat patients included in the study, 60 patients (33 men) were randomized to cefepime + metronidazole and 61 (27 men) to imipenemcilastatin. Cefepime + metronidazole treatment was successful in 52 (87%) patients and imipenem-cilastatin in 44 (72%) patients (p = 0.004). Microbiological eradication was established in similar proportions in both groups (cefepime + metronidazole, 43; imipenem-cilastatin, 38). Conclusion: Further studies are warranted to confirm the better results with the cefepime + metronidazole regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 166
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost Efficacy of Tazobactam/Piperacillin versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infection
    Eva Susanne Dietrich
    Björn Schubert
    Winfried Ebner
    Franz Daschner
    PharmacoEconomics, 2001, 19 : 79 - 94
  • [32] MEROPENEM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS REQUIRING SURGERY
    KANELLAKOPOULOU, K
    GIAMARELLOU, H
    PAPADOTHOMAKOS, P
    TSIPRAS, H
    CHLOROYIANNIS, J
    THEAKOU, R
    SFIKAKIS, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 12 (06) : 449 - 453
  • [33] Imipenem/cilastatin sodium/relebactam fixed combination to treat urinary infections and complicated intra-abdominal bacterial infections
    Thakare, R.
    Dasgupta, A.
    Chopra, S.
    DRUGS OF TODAY, 2020, 56 (04) : 241 - 255
  • [34] PHARMACOECONOMICS OF PIPERACILLIN TAZOBACTAM AND IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS
    JHEE, SS
    GILL, MA
    YELLIN, AE
    BERNE, TV
    HESELTINE, PNR
    APPLEMAN, MD
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 17 (01) : 126 - 135
  • [35] PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN FOR TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS
    BRISMAR, B
    MALMBORG, AS
    TUNEVALL, G
    WRETLIND, B
    BERGMAN, L
    MENTZING, LO
    NYSTROM, PO
    KIHLSTROM, E
    BACKSTRAND, B
    SKAU, T
    KASHOLMTENGVE, B
    SJOBERG, L
    OLSSONLILJEQUIST, B
    TALLY, FP
    GATENBECK, L
    EKLUND, AE
    NORD, CE
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (12) : 2766 - 2773
  • [36] Cefozopran, meropenem, or imipenem-cilastatin compared with cefepime as empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic adult patients: A multicenter prospective randomized trial
    Nakane, Takahiko
    Tamura, Kazuo
    Hino, Masayuki
    Tamaki, Toshiharu
    Yoshida, Isao
    Fukushima, Toshihiro
    Tatsumi, Youichi
    Nakagawa, Yasuaki
    Hatanaka, Kazuo
    Takahashi, Tsutomu
    Akiyama, Nobu
    Tanimoto, Mitsune
    Ohyashiki, Kazuma
    Urabe, Akio
    Masaoka, Toru
    Kanamaru, Akihisa
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 21 (1-2) : 16 - 22
  • [37] Monopenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections
    P. Kempf
    Infection, 1997, 25 : 316 - 316
  • [38] Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections
    Kempf, P
    Bauernfeind, A
    Muller, A
    Blum, J
    INFECTION, 1996, 24 (06) : 473 - 479
  • [39] A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN WITH OR WITHOUT AMIKACIN AS AN EMPIRICAL ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT FOR FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    KOJIMA, A
    SHINKAI, T
    SOEJIMA, Y
    OKAMOTO, H
    EGUCHI, K
    SASAKI, Y
    TAMURA, T
    OSHITA, F
    OHE, Y
    SAIJO, N
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 17 (05): : 400 - 404
  • [40] IMIPENEM CILASTATIN VERSUS AMIKACIN PLUS PIPERACILLIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED MULTI-CLINIC STUDY
    NORRBY, SR
    VANDERCAM, B
    LOUIE, T
    RUNDE, V
    NORBERG, B
    ANNIKO, M
    ANDRIEN, F
    BAUDRIHAYE, M
    BOW, E
    BURMAN, LA
    BURY, J
    EZZEDINE, H
    GIGI, J
    GRANLUND, M
    HOLM, J
    LUNDBERG, S
    MICHAUX, JL
    LESAUX, N
    WAHLIN, A
    ZAKRISSON, E
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1987, : 65 - 78